Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (100623)	4/7/2005 3:34:32 PM
From: epicure	Respond to of 108807

I had a lot of fun with those tests. I'm thinking of letting my students take some of them. Build your own God isn't really a tinkertoy thing- it's more an explanation of how certain qualities chosen might be contradictory.

To: Grainne who wrote (100623)	4/7/2005 4:56:25 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I took the test and found myself pretty much average according to the criteria specified (i.e. 27%) However, I thought that the test was flawed. Here's one example. There is no contradiction, since God can act through me or another. He is not a magician, and He works in mysterious ways. It was fun, though. It also shows why it is difficult to come to agreement on fundamental issues, such as those we've discussed this very day. You agreed that: There exists an all-powerful, loving and good God And also that: To allow an innocent child to suffer needlessly when one could easily prevent it is morally reprehensible These two beliefs together generate what is known as 'The Problem of Evil'. The problem is simple: if God is all-powerful, loving and good, that means he can do what he wants and will do what is morally right. But surely this means that he would not allow an innocent child to suffer needlessly, as he could easily prevent it. Yet he does. Much infant suffering is the result of human action, but much is also due to natural causes, such as disease, flood or famine. In both cases, God could stop it, yet he does not. Attempts to explain this apparent contradiction are known as 'theodicies' and many have been produced. Most conclude that God allows suffering to help us grow spiritually and/or to allow the greater good of human freedom. Whether these theodicies are adequate is the subject of continuing debate.