Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (228249)	4/8/2005 2:32:20 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578563

I find myself in complete agreement with you in your comments to Tim. The only thing that I would add is that it is deeply ironic for people like Tim to be so completely oblivious to the track record of activist judges like Priscilla Owen, who never met a corporation she wouldn't go into the raptures with in flagrante delicto while at the same time, she utterly disregards the rights, the needs and the desires of real human beings. What's infuriating is that the right is attacking their own over this issue. Judge Greer is a religious, right to life, conservative GOPer. He is also a man of the law and must act accordingly. But the right just does not want to hear it. ted

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (228249)	4/8/2005 4:43:10 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1578563

The only thing that I would add is that it is deeply ironic for people like Tim to be so completely oblivious to the track record of activist judges like Priscilla Owen, who never met a corporation she wouldn't go into the raptures with in flagrante delicto while at the same time, she utterly disregards the rights, the needs and the desires of real human beings. Deciding for a corporation over the interests of "real human beings" is not necessarily unconstitutional. To my knowledge we haven't debated Priscilla Owen's decisions here. If you want to show me a decision by her that is against what the constitution says, and point to the part of the constitution that it violates then I'll comment. Tim