Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (7833)	4/8/2005 7:52:32 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

re: several items 1. fell flat: NAFF's web stats are actually above FBN and Webnode unique visitors and page view records for this period at post-4/1. And that's despite the outage SI/IHub had on Fri. 2. Your representation of my position ("You and your crew can be on record that there is no such thing as a crooked short, no problem with naked shorting and that there will never be a conviction of a short guru.") is of course a position I've never represented. And you wonder (as you did earlier today on another thread) why people don't take you seriously. Well, you don't address real points when people raise them -- you instead resort to this "fake position" thing as a smoke screen. Exactly as "NSS" know-nothings resort to "NSS" as a smoke screen. Heh, maybe you should get Byrne to write your posts for you. He at least has a better "pretend" vocabularic understanding that would make you look better if you give him your SI password. Just tell him to leave out the Dana Carvey "Tools of Satan" diatribe, which would of course make both of you look stupid, instead of just you ... errr... I mean, him ... no wait ... I mean both of you. Wait ... which of you is taking that seriously? Uhh, geez, he said it, you quoted it, now I'm confused... is it both of youse stupid or just the one, or which one, or do you both agree, or not, or well, whatever. I'll just let you and Patrick and Patch and Aunt Jenny work it out. Permit me to suggest a "rock-scissors-paper" contest should your further inquiries towards that matter remain unresolved with the chicken bone thing.

To: rrufff who wrote (7833)	4/8/2005 8:03:37 AM
From: John Sladek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

rruff, They're not gone at all - you're a follower of the "get shorty" gurus, and it appears from this thread that you have taken over dkgross's job as jmhollens fart catcher. Subject 55587 The gurus are gone, thank goodness ... The followers may come out and kiss posterior Are you aware that many of the stocks that Hollen promotes wind up going to just about zero after a big run ups. The huge runups are totally natural, but the inevitable decline is solely the fault of the naked short sellers.