SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ed Huang who wrote (7979)4/9/2005 7:56:40 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 22250
 
Creeping boycott

Caterpillar's shareholders meeting will pitch pro-Palestinians against the American Jewish Congress.

Ran Dagoni, Washington 7 Apr 05 14:53

The Jewish establishment in the US has begun preparing of the annual shareholders meeting of Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT) next week in Chicago. Caterpillar is the world’s largest manufacturer of equipment for development work. The agenda at the meeting will include a resolution calling on the company to refrain from selling bulldozers and other equipment to Israel, and to make sure that its equipment is not used to violate human rights.
Pro-Palestinian organizations that have bought shares in the company will bring the proposal up for a vote, in hopes that this will increase awareness on the part of the company’s management of what these organizations regard as the risks of doing business with Israel. Caterpillar sells military versions of its D9 bulldozer to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), which has been used to destroy Palestinian houses.

Delegitimizing Israel

Activists in Jewish organizations in the US regard the pro-Palestinian initiative in Caterpillar as one more link in a chain of initiatives aimed at delegitimizing business with Israel, along the lines of the campaign against the apartheid regime in South Africa.

These initiatives are based on a call to public investment entities, such as pension funds for government employees, to sell shares in Israeli companies, Israeli government bonds, and shares of foreign companies doing business with Israel.

”There is an ill-advised and troublesome effort calling for total or selective divestment from corporations that do business with Israel, and to pressure others, such as Caterpillar Inc., to stop selling products to Israel,” says American Jewish Congress president Paul S. Miller. “Preying on the emotions of well-meaning individuals who think that they are contributing to peace, these divestment campaigns coincides with other efforts which seek to undermine Israel’s self-defense, its economy and its legitimacy, and to pressure Israel to make concessions during peace negotiations with the Palestinians. It is time to make it clear that these tactics will not work.”

The tactics devised by the American Jewish Congress are expected to serve as a model for other Jewish organizations not just national organizations with tens of thousands of members, but also synagogues and regional and local Jewish fellowship organizations.

In the effort to defeat the pro-Palestinian initiative in Caterpillar, the American Jewish Congress has bought Caterpillar shares. It will take advantage of the platform provided by those shares at the shareholders meeting to call on the company’s management not to surrender to pressure. It appears that the American Jewish Congress will propose a counter resolution calling on shareholders to oppose the termination of the company’s commercial relations with Israel.

Caterpillar-free region

The number of pro-Palestinian shareholders in Caterpillar is unknown, but is probably negligible, and designed solely to provide them with a platform at the company shareholders meeting. The campaign received a significant boost from a lawsuit filed against the company by the family of Rachel Corrie, a pro-Palestinian volunteer from the US who was killed in March 2003 by an IDF Caterpillar bulldozer while trying to prevent the destruction of a Palestinian house in the territories.

Liat Weingart, a co-director of Jewish Voice for Peace, one of the organizations promoting the pro-Palestinian initiative in Caterpillar, said, “When shareholders initially brought this issue to Caterpillar years ago, before we even filed the resolution, we told the company, ‘you’re putting yourself at risk for a lawsuit.’ The lawsuit adds fuel to the fire of the argument that Caterpillar is working against its own best interests by not responding in any kind of substantive way when shareholders have requested that they investigate the matter.”

Another development working in favor of the pro-Palestinian resolution is a vote in Limerick, Ireland on whether to declare the city a “Caterpillar-free area,” in protest against the company’s sale of heavy equipment to Israel. The resolution forbids the municipality to use equipment manufactured by Caterpillar in any public space in the city, and calls on all labor unions in the city to avoid using such equipment.

If the resolution is approved, Limerick will be the first city in the world to be declared “Caterpillar-free.” While the financial significance of such a measure is negligible, it could have symbolic significance, and is liable to influence other cities to adopt similar resolutions.

Up until now, Caterpillar’s management has resolutely opposed any attempt to force it to stop doing business with Israel. A short message on the company’s website states, “Caterpillar shares the world's concern over unrest in the Middle East and we certainly have compassion for all those affected by the political strife.

”However, more than two million Caterpillar machines and engines are at work in virtually every country and region of the world each day. We have neither the legal right nor the means to police individual use of that equipment.

”We believe any comments on political conflict in the region are best left to our governmental leaders who have the ability to impact action and advance the peace process.”



To: Ed Huang who wrote (7979)4/10/2005 1:58:41 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Respond to of 22250
 
Israeli/neocon plan to destabilize is being implemented:

Ethnic tensions in Kirkuk dangerously high, raising fears of civil war

Fri Apr 8, 7:00 PM ET Top Stories - Knight Ridder Newspapers


By Tom Lasseter, Knight Ridder Newspapers

KIRKUK, Iraq - U.S. military officials are concerned that ethnic tensions could turn into widespread violence and, perhaps, civil war in Iraq's northern city of Kirkuk, setting a dangerous pattern for rest of the country.


• Mexico City mayor awaits his fate
• DETROIT'S TRAVELING ELEPHANTS: Winky, Wanda warily test their new territory
• A Last Farewell to Pope
• Bush, Sharon to meet as Israel prepares for Gaza withdrawal
• A final testament

AP Photo
Slideshow: Talabani Named Interim Iraq President



Echo Company
Knight Ridder Special Report (at philly.com)


Kirkuk oil fields hold around 9 million barrels of proven reserves and Kurdish talk of secession is at a fever pitch.

A bloc of Kurdish-led politicians received the majority of seats on the provincial council after January elections and is now threatening to fill most key positions with Kurds. Arab and Turkmen (also known as Turkomen) politicians protested with a series of walkouts and now refuse to show up at council meetings, where Kurdish leaders insist on speaking in their mother language.

The Kurds are also accelerating efforts to bring back families pushed out of Kirkuk and the surrounding province by former dictator Saddam Hussein during his massive resettlement campaigns aimed at weakening Kurdish opposition. The Kurds hope the influx will help make Kirkuk a part of the Iraqi region of Kurdistan and possibly provide an economic engine for an independent Kurdish nation. Breaking away from Iraq, though, would be difficult for the Kurds because of pressure from neighboring countries such as Iran and Turkey, which oppose an independent Kurdistan.

"We're worried about the domino effect of the Kurds getting the senior leadership positions and the Arabs and Turkomen going back to their constituencies and saying the Kurds have taken over, and the Turkomen and, to a greater extent, the Arabs rise up," said Lt. Col. Anthony Wickham, the U.S. Army's liaison to the Kirkuk council.

"Worst-case scenario is a civil war," he said. "The threat is out there. There are armed Arab groups, Turkomen groups that say they need to arm themselves, and the Kurds say, `We know how to keep the peace, we'll deploy the Peshmerga,'" a militia that numbers in the tens of thousands.

Wickham is worried not only about potential havoc in Kirkuk, but also about the destabilizing effect it would have across ethnically divided Iraq as it makes its way toward democracy.

Saddam used savage military might to suppress ethnic and religious groups that opposed him. With him gone, many of those groups are sorting out long-simmering tensions.

Rizqar Ali Hamajan, a Kirkuk council member and a senior official in the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, a political party, said his party estimates that Saddam pushed about 600,000 Kurds out of the Kirkuk area. Not only should those people be able to return to the province - which has an estimated population of 1.5 million - but they should be able to bring their families with them, Hamajan said.

The province is about 40 percent Arab and 35 percent Kurd, according to U.S. officials in the area. The return of even a small percentage of those 600,000 and their families to Kirkuk would give Kurds a decisive numerical advantage.

Many in Iraq consider Kirkuk key in the effort to keep ethnic differences from tearing the nation apart. Kirkuk, as elsewhere in Iraq, has seen its share of battles between insurgents and U.S. and Iraqi forces, and, as ethnic tensions rise, the danger of individual attacks triggering wider violence has increased.

On March 19, for example, a yellow taxi pulled up in front of a police station and a passenger threw out a soda can. When an officer came out to inspect the can, it blew up, killing him. The next day, a roadside bomb at a traffic roundabout exploded near a truck full of police officers on their way to their comrade's funeral. Four officers were killed.

When police failed to find any leads, they returned to the traffic circle the following day and rounded up potential witnesses. Among them were two Turkmen vegetable vendors. While in custody, both vendors were beaten and tortured by a Kurdish officer who pushed lit cigarettes into their bodies, lashed them with cables and punched and kicked them in their faces, according to family accounts verified by U.S. military officials.

The two vendors were cousins of Tahsin Mohammed Kahya, a Turkmen who's the chair of the Kirkuk council and an immensely popular local politician.

His tribe called for massive protests and violence. The city stood on the brink.

"It could have been the spark," Wickham said.

Kahya asked his tribe to keep its guns away and to let the political process take its course. But he's far from certain that the peace will hold, especially given the provincial council's inability to appoint government leaders and the prospect of a Kurd-dominated government.



"If the decision-makers cannot agree, then it will go to the streets," he said. "If we fail, we will tell the people we have failed, and it's up to them to decide what they want to do - maybe then we would have a bad situation."

Maj. Gen. Joseph Taluto, who commands Task Force Liberty, the U.S. Army element stretching from just north of Baghdad to Kirkuk, also worries about the tensions. "As the politics goes down lower, I think the level of understanding (between ethnic groups) becomes less," and the result, he said, is bombs sometimes being placed on the road.

While U.S. officials used to intervene in local governmental affairs, choosing council members and making sure they all spoke with one another, they remained in the background after the Iraqi elections in January, letting Iraqis for the most part succeed or fail on their own accord.

The need for ethnic groups in Kirkuk to negotiate their differences is probably the most important issue facing Iraq today, Taluto said.

"What can Task Force Liberty do about that? Not a hell of a lot, frankly," he said.

Many Arabs and Turkomen say the Kurds are using force, when necessary, to push them out of Kirkuk. They accuse Kurds, who say they left the Peshmerga militia before joining the Iraqi army and police, of using their positions to intimidate people into leaving.

Hamajan, the Kurdish council member, denied there were any Peshmerga present in Kirkuk. He then added, smiling, that "the leader of the Peshmerga is about to become president of Iraq," referring to Jalal Talabani, a former Peshmerga commander who was elected president on Wednesday by the national assembly.

Outside Hamajan's office, Kurdish men in military fatigues holding AK-47s patrolled the gate.

U.S. officials confirmed that at least half the Iraqi army troops in Kirkuk are Kurds. Wickham said he knows of Arabs being taken from Kirkuk and put into a Kurd-controlled prison in nearby Sulaimaniyah, but he didn't know the specifics of who took them there or why.

Khalaf Farhan, a Sunni Arab and former army general in Saddam's army, said Iraqi soldiers raided his house last week. Just before he was blindfolded, Farhan said, he saw a large Kurdish-looking man who was speaking Kurdish.

Farhan, whose face was bruised and scratched and whose left eye was badly swollen days later, said he was beaten in the face with a rifle butt, punched and kicked.

When he was shoved into a vehicle outside, Farhan said, one of the soldiers leaned toward him and said, "OK, do you want to sell the house?"

In one area, at least 40,000 Kurds have returned to rebuild a series of small villages demolished by Saddam. Those families were given $1,000 each and building supplies by the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan operating out of Sulaimaniyah, a neighboring province.

The resettlement of Kurds in Kirkuk is provided for by Iraq's transitional law, which also says that the decision about Kirkuk becoming a part of Kurdistan will "take into account the will of the people."

The Kurds interpret this to mean that a provincial referendum will decide the matter.

Many Arabs and Turkomen said the Kurds are pushing for resettlement not just out of a sense of historical justice, but to stack the chips in their favor for the referendum, and, ultimately, to break away from Iraq.

One of the few things that U.S. and Iraqi officials interviewed in Kirkuk agreed about was that if the Kurds went down that path, it would be a bloody one.



To: Ed Huang who wrote (7979)4/11/2005 9:51:09 PM
From: Brasco One  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
GOD BLESS USA!!