Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (108539)	4/9/2005 10:13:47 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793957

Check out the website. The part from the website that is posted with Volokh's comment is enough to make my blood run cold.

To: JohnM who wrote (108539)	4/9/2005 11:47:04 PM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793957

I'm stunned into deep silence Yeah right. :o)

To: JohnM who wrote (108539)	4/11/2005 7:06:35 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793957

This powerline post sums up my view of the Yale Conference Rush powerlineblog.com Over the weekend, we published Little Trunk's reports on the Yale Law School conclave on the Constitution, and how it should be rewritten. Rush Limbaugh picked up on the story today, and quoted from our posts. His commentary included the following: The point is that there's some people that have gotten together and have decided that we need a new Constitution. George Soros is funding it, and when you read all of this, what you discover is that they want to enshrine veritably every tenet of liberalism in a Constitution so that liberalism would become what is constitutional. All it tells you is they don't like the Constitution as it is, they think the Constitution is unfair, incomplete, incorrect because it doesn't enshrine their elitist view of things. That's a pretty fair summary, I think.