Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (228755)	4/12/2005 8:34:25 AM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573099

Great post, PD! Taro

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (228755)	4/12/2005 1:07:43 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573099

You appear to have missed the point. Each line has equivalency. Ray Rockafeller (D), = Mel Martiniz (R). Harry Reid (D) = Tom DeLay (R). Bill Clinton (D) >= Bob Packwood (R). Tejek attitude: Ray Rockafeller (D), no problem; Mel Martiniz (R), problem. Harry Reid (D), maybe problem - but no big whoop; Tom DeLay (R), problem needs immediate attention. Bill Clinton (D) - perjurer / allegedly used power to get sex, no problem; Bob Packwood (R)- allegedly used power to get sex, no comment. Sorry Ted, but your response is ample proof of your partisanship. You may be registered Independent just like Bill O'Reilley, but you are hardly as centrist as he is. Thanks for slanting my comments in a way that supports your argument. No surprise there. As I said, on the Dems side I see one Mr. Piggie in Packwood and one potential piggie, Mr. Reid. On the GOP side, I see two Mr. Piggies, Mssrs. Delay and Martinez. There is no bias there........its based on the facts nothing more. I really sorry you don't like my POV. However, if anything, the GOP shows greater evidence of corrupt behavior. Instead of shooting the messenger, you might look into why your party is so corrupt. But the truth is you don't care, do you? I have complained on a number of occasions re. the lack of backbone that the Dems have shown the GOP. No need to point out the partisanship there. It is self evident. Its just that the GOP is so damn corrupt; its nearly intolerable. Your definition of corrupt appears to be "that which is not Democrat". Harry Reid selling land federal land worth hundreds of millions of dollars to firms that bribed his son does not register, because he is a Democrat. There is a corrupt party and it is the Democrat party. You can get just as frustrated as you wish. Some people have intellectual curiosity, and do not buy into the leftwing spin just because several nuts repeat it. Read my lips: Only a fool would not see a problem with the GOP. Are you a fool, or amoral? ted