SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ish who wrote (101065)4/13/2005 3:20:47 PM
From: Grainne  Respond to of 108807
 
I think settlers everywhere in America dammed the rivers, Ish. I don't think you can say it is just the people in the Pacific Northwest. Dams create irrigation for farms, as well as provide relatively clean power. I do know that Northwest people call themselves Salmon Nation, and see healthy salmon runs as part of their regional identity. They have been struggling for years trying to make the rivers more hospitable to salmon. Now Bush's attempts to cut the budget for all programs that do not support warmongering or the livelihood of his corporate fat cat friends directly or indirectly have impacted salmon also:

Federal Officials Propose Less Water for Pacific Salmon

Source: Copyright 2004, Environment News Service
Date: June 9, 2004
Byline: J.R. Pegg

WASHINGTON, DC, June 8, 2004 (ENS) - For four dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers, federal officials have announced a plan to reduce summer spill - the practice of releasing water over dams to help young salmon migrate to the sea in summer. The plan is supposed to result in lower electricity rates for consumers in the Pacific Northwest.

The proposal would cut summer spill by 39 percent, a move that salmon advocates say will kill tens of thousands of fish and undermine the faltering federal plan to protect and restore salmon and steelhead in the Pacific Northwest.

"This is a scientifically irresponsible and indefensible decision," said Jim Martin the former chief of fisheries for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and a current member of the National Wildlife Federation Board of Directors.

Summer spill allows fish to move past dams without going through the turbines - an impediment often lethal to the migrating salmon.

Conservationists believe summer spill is essential, and Martin says the proposed cuts come with an expectation of low water flows and high river temperatures this summer, conditions that do not bode well for migrating salmon.

But utility executives do not care for summer spill because water diverted into spill gates reduces the production of electricity at hydroelectric facilities, and they have found the Bush administration sympathetic to their concerns.

Federal officials insist the plan mitigates the impact on the fish and note it is less severe than a proposal floated in March that would have cut spill water by 55 percent.

Summer spill currently continues through August 31 at the four dams. The amended proposal calls for ending current spill operations at the Ice Harbor and John Day dams on August 22 and at Bonneville and The Dalles dams at the end of July.

Ice Harbor dam is on the Snake River; while the Bonneville, John Day and The Dalles dams are on the Columbia River.

"We believe this proposal would result in the survival of at least as many fish as the full summer spill program while reducing costs to Northwest electric ratepayers by approximately $20 million to $31 million," said Steve Wright, administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the federal agency that oversees 31 federal hydroelectric projects in the region.

Wright said the plan would reduce BPA wholesale power rates by one to two percent.

It also would only impact the 2004 summer spill, whereas the initial proposal would have set up a three year pilot program.

The latest proposal includes several measures to offset reductions in summer spill.

These include - increased water releases on the lower Snake River in July; increased control of northern pikeminnow, a predatory fish that feed on juvenile salmon; and adjusted spill from the John Day Dam on the Columbia River to protect juvenile chinook salmon from stranding.

"This modified plan is a reasonable and sound means to meet biological objectives more efficiently," said Brigadier General William Grisoli, commander of the Northwestern Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Critics of the reduced spill see the mitigation efforts as inadequate and contend the proposal has little to do with saving salmon.

Cuts to summer spill water spurn "the unanimous scientific advice of Northwest fishery agencies and Indian Tribes," said Pat Ford, executive director of Save Our Wild Salmon.

"Dams harvest about 85 percent of Columbia River fall Chinook salmon each year," said Buzz Ramsey of the Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association. "Spill is the most important measure for mitigating hydro's excessive take of baby salmon. To make up for that loss, BPA continues to outline offsets that are insulting at worst and sketchy at best."

In addition to direct impacts like slower migration times, increased predation and hotter river temperatures, the proposal is likely to result in more fish being trucked and barged downriver.

"Salmon belong in rivers, not barges and trucks," said Rob Masonis, Northwest regional director with American Rivers. "This is a short-sighted move by the administration that ignores the long term harm it will cause to wild salmon and salmon dependent communities."

Sara Patton, executive director of the Northwest Energy Coalition says the plan will provide minimal benefits, if any, to Northwest ratepayers in the form of lower electricity bills.

Patton said the BPA inappropriately counts as "cost" the loss of projected extra income from the sales of excess hydropower to California.

"The alleged savings from curtailing spill to electric ratepayers are grossly overstated," Patton said. "We are talking seven cents to a maximum of 66 cents per month for residential customers."

There is added concern that the proposal guts the federal salmon plan.

U.S. District Court Judge James Redden ruled in May 2003 that the federal salmon plan violated the Endangered Species Act because there was no certainty that the recommended actions in the plan would be carried out.

Fear over the court's reaction to reducing summer spills kept federal managers from approving the policy for the Bonneville Power Administration in the summer of 2003.

Judge Redden originally ordered the Bush administration to revise the entire plan by June 2004. Last month he gave the administration an extension until November, but called for a draft revision to be released by the end of August.

The amended summer spill proposal will be discussed by federal agencies, state and local governments, tribes and other regional stakeholders at a public meeting scheduled for June 14 in Portland, Oregon.

The final decision is expected by the end of the month - more information on the plan can be found here.

waterconserve.info



To: Ish who wrote (101065)4/14/2005 4:37:40 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108807
 
I'm not sure whether you are actually interested in salmon runs, Ish (or more in making fun of Pacific Northwesters), but here is an article discussing how few wild salmon there appear to be so far, and the lengths people are going to to make sure they get up the fish ladders at the dam, even so far as shooting blanks to scare sea lions away:

Snacking sea lions scarfing up sparse Columbia chinook run

By Hal Bernton

Seattle Times staff reporter

MARK HARRISON / THE SEATTLE TIMES

BONNEVILLE DAM — At the Bonneville Dam, more than 140 miles from the Pacific Ocean, spring has emerged as the season of the sea lion. Dozens of bewhiskered bulls congregate in pursuit of prized Columbia River chinook that this year, so far, are in acutely short supply.

As of late Tuesday, about 200 of the spring chinook, which are protected under the Endangered Species Act, had gone through the dam's fish passage, compared with the 10-year average of 3,085 for the same date. It's the worst early showing in decades, with biologists unsure whether this run of hatchery and threatened wild salmon is very late, very weak or some combination of the two.

To protect those salmon milling below the dam, the biologists are preparing a sea-lion battle strategy that includes noisemakers, sonar and eventually grates to keep them out of the fish ladders, an effort reminiscent of the Seattle campaign in the 1980s and '90s to keep sea lions away from steelhead moving through the Ballard Locks.

"Even if they're only taking 20 [salmon] a day, that's a huge percentage of what is actually going through the dam," said Robert Stansell, an Army Corps of Engineer biologist who has spent the past three years studying the spring show of sea lions at the Bonneville Dam, about 40 miles east of Portland. "And right now, we really don't have a good count."

MARK HARRISON / THE SEATTLE TIMES

Two bulls squabble over position at the base of the dam. They may soon be occupied with more-pressing matters: Federal biologists began experimenting this week with noisemakers to try to keep the hungry interlopers out of the Bonneville Dam's fish ladders.

Through most of the past century, sea lions were an infrequent sight at Bonneville. But their numbers have soared since the 1970s, their West Coast population more than tripling to surpass 300,000. The bulls, which stray far from California breeding grounds in pursuit of food, appear to have discovered that the Columbia River dam forms a major choke point for salmon.

For the past three springs, more than 100 bulls have shown up at Bonneville. They stay through the peak of the run of spring chinook, which has been a focal point of a federal Columbia River salmon-recovery effort that stretches back more than a decade and has soaked up billions of dollars. Some of the sea lions appear so comfortable that they sun on the concrete ramps of the dam's spillway.

Sea lions do not determine the fate of a spring chinook run, which may be reduced by factors such as drought in freshwater spawning grounds, the number of young salmon killed passing downstream through dam turbines and poor feeding conditions in the ocean. The 2004 spring chinook run was strong, despite sea lions catching some 3,900 fish, about 2 percent of the fish that arrived at the base of the Bonneville Dam, according to Stansell's study.

Biologists are debating what has caused the early part of this year's run to falter at the dam. The fish could have faced unexpected hardships at sea. Or, perhaps, most arrived safely at the mouth of the Columbia but for some reason stacked up downstream waiting for the right moment to surge inland. The run was initially expected to top 250,000 past Bonneville but may fall well short of that forecast.

With fish passage at the dam so weak, the number of fish eaten by sea lions is a much greater concern this year. After meetings with the National Marine Fisheries Service, biologists began to experiment this week with noisemakers to try to keep sea lions out of the dam's fish ladders. At least two of the bolder bulls pursued salmon into the concrete confines, offering tourists an unexpected sight through the underwater glass at a visitors center.

Yesterday, biologists scored an initial success as a high-school volunteer scout sighted one of those bulls — branded with the number 404 — inside a fish ladder. A pistol-wielding biologist shot blanks known as a "screamers" at the sea lion.

"He [the bull] dove very quickly, and that's the last we've seen of it," Stansell said.

By next week, federal biologists hope to have three sonar devices operating near the mouth of the fish ladders. They hope the devices will emit underwater sounds spooky enough to keep the sea lions at a greater distance.

Failure at Ballard Locks

The Bonneville Dam tactics piggy-back on the work done at the Ballard Locks, which in the '80s emerged as a favorite spot for sea lions.

The Seattle effort included trapping the sea lions, shooting them with rubber-tipped arrows, broadcasting fake killer-whale sounds, exploding underwater fireworks and other tactics, but it ultimately proved to be a losing effort to save the steelhead.

"The run we were trying to protect essentially doesn't exist anymore," said Steve Jeffries, a Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife biologist who worked with sea lions at the Ballard Locks and has consulted on the Bonneville situation.

Jeffries said that protecting fish at the Bonneville Dam poses a bigger challenge because it's a much larger structure, with four fish ladders and eight entry points. Sonar does not work well in bubble-rich water such as the stretch of river below the dam. It also does not do much to deter sea lions that already associate the dam with fish, Jeffries added.

Stansell acknowledged that the system may not work well but wants to give it a try. "We'll just have to wait and see, and evaluate it," Stansell said.

The buildup of sea lions also is tracked by sport fishermen pursuing chinook by boat and along the banks. They said fishing has been spotty, with the added frustration of sea lions occasionally stealing the fish they hook.

Even when the sea lions aren't snatching fish, anglers said, their presence scares away the chinook. A few said they wished they could dispatch the sea lions with live ammunition, which is prohibited by federal marine-mammal-protection laws.

But Jeff Smith of Portland said he likes sea lions and almost got in a fistfight with other anglers who were throwing stones to try to scare sea lions away from a hooked fish. "I don't care if I get a fish or not, they [the sea lions] are just up here trying to survive," Smith said.

seattletimes.nwsource.com