SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Snowshoe who wrote (61849)4/13/2005 7:55:40 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 74559
 
Sherlock,

Now that is some impressive sleuthing.

Continuing in the NZ Herald article I read that " Dr Chris de Freitas said he had never received any research funding from petroleum companies"

Elementary, really. Since Dr de Freitas is engaging in pseudo-science, he was paid for that and not for research.

And then he really sticks his foot in it by claiming "his brother had taken no part in the publication of his article in the Bulletin."

Obviously, editors never have anything to do with what goes into their publications. Doesn't everyone know this? <guffaw>



To: Snowshoe who wrote (61849)4/14/2005 3:15:22 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Regarding corrupted scientists, this is also interesting:

"In 2003, Stanford University signed a $225 million, 10-year contract to study global climate change, which allows Exxon and other corporate sponsors to select which research projects will receive funding, Washburn reports."

siliconinvestor.com

America, the Land of Bought-Off and the Home of the Brave-Cons.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News