Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (101120)	4/13/2005 10:43:32 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

<< You and Bill seem to be in the camp where you assign attributes to other people (including myself and others on the thread) without evidence. >> Not true. Brumar and I simply asked you a question. You made an assertion about someone that you were asked to support. Anything beyond that is rhetorical jactitation on your part. (BTW, please refrain from trashing me in third party posts. It's rude. Unless you feel it's not, thereby giving the rest of us permission to take you apart in third party posts all over SI.)

To: cosmicforce who wrote (101120)	4/13/2005 11:27:15 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

You weren't done with the subject - if you had been you and X wouldn't have continued the discussion on the thread: Message 21220118 Where was the evidence that this particular business school drop-out.. I'm not the one making an assertion about Woods, so I don't need to offer any evidence. I did ask you for your evidence of your assertion that he was ignorant of scientific knowledge of his game. The idea that one has to have 5-7 years of university education is nonsense. The mention of dropout is nice. Do you make a point of calling Bill Gates or Michael Dell dropouts whenever their name comes up?