SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (109107)4/13/2005 8:11:01 PM
From: Snowshoe  Respond to of 793957
 
The new larger wind turbines are less harmful to birds because the blades turn much slower. However, you still need to be careful about where you put them. Lots of birds are killed by flying into buildings and radio towers at night and during foggy weather, so I expect the same thing could happen with poorly sited wind farms. Also there's a new problem with wind farms on forested hills resulting in high bat mortality.

Every energy source seems to have some kind of down side, unfortunately.



To: Bill who wrote (109107)4/13/2005 8:11:15 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 793957
 
It would be a shame to have gone through all the trouble of saving some of these birds, like raptors and osprey only to chew them up with windmills. Yes, hard to tell how valid the concern.



To: Bill who wrote (109107)4/13/2005 8:12:54 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793957
 
cape wind farm

My rule of thumb is that any form of electrical generation that must be subsidized should not be built. Wind and Solar are not "base" units, they can't be depended upon 24/7/365. Build Gas or Nuclear.