Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (160542)	4/15/2005 12:28:29 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Respond to of 281500

The real question is one story in the Slate by a right winger gone to the New Republic does not make a story true. If the story had legs there's be far more that 527 hits on Google, with 99% of those links to hate sites. I'm not defending Ritter, nor would I let him (or any adult) sleep with my children. But what I see here for poor Ritter is a rightwing attempt to discredit him because he had a different point of view than Bush. As it turns out, Ritter was right about the WMD. Ritter was dismayed about the effect of the sanctions on the poor people of Iraq too. Neither of those stories ($400,000 or young girls) has any credibility so far. Orca