SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : PEAK OIL - The New Y2K or The Beginning of the Real End? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gg cox who wrote (351)4/15/2005 5:14:30 PM
From: Mahatmabenfoo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1183
 
"This is what i said re clocks... Take a walk through...."

Yes -- I can see you never came close to advocating wind-up clocks.

I agree with your general point that even small changes (making electric clocks not *constantly* report the time to an empty room) would help -- especially if you apply that reasoning to every sort of device.

My point is there is a difference between every new clock being more energy efficient (they way you describe) which is good, and REPLACING all existing clocks (with your more efficient electric clock -or- my windup) which is less clearly good. Creating new products also has an energy cost, and unless they're dramatically more efficient the energy to create the replacment may not be justified for a long time.

The math for these things seems elusive. Does anyone know, or could anyone know?

Consider recycling plastic bottles -- which need to be washed in hot water, transported, sorted, shredded, melted. Is there a net oil savings? Or something as stupid as wind-up watches verses an electric watch that is simpler to manufacture, but needs battery replaced about once a year. After 5 years, which uses less oil?

Maybe the real answer is once energy starts to decline at 2% (or 5% or 8% a year) (Alaska is declining at 6% a year now, but I don't know if that's representative) such subtle questions will be irrelevant. Well be back soon enough to no watch, no bottle, which means back to picking up our beer in a bucket (the 1920's way).

Sorry, rambling...

Time to go back to my propeller-beanie invention, so the propeller spins in the self-created breeze as you walk, storing the energy in micro-flywheels and ultracapacitors. These will be supplemented by solar-fingernail polish using Tesla waves to beam micro-volts in a direct through-the-earth transmission system.

Oh darn, I just gave away one of my big secret plans to save the world...

- Tilyou1@yahoo.com



To: gg cox who wrote (351)4/16/2005 10:13:42 PM
From: CF Rebel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1183
 
Your post reminded me of something I came across a couple of years ago when a friend was looking for a new water heater. He didn't buy it but I probably would. They claim up to 50% energy savings over standard water heaters.

tankless-water-heater.com

I think that if available energy-saving technologies were implemented where at all possible, this country could easily save 30%.

CF Rebel