Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yogizuna who wrote (32428)	4/15/2005 7:41:21 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

You actually think you deserve better after this? Message 21212362 Come on, man, I doubt anyone could even count the number of quack cures for cancer. Remember, there were lots of people stepping up and saying Laetrile cured them. Hey, you can STILL get yourself some if you want it: google.com and their are lots of testimonials to its cures. You accept the claims made for it too? Here's another one: sumeria.net And another: amazon.com Do you have ANY understanding of what "evidence" is? And "statistics"? And just how much you have to do to actually establish that a treatment really works? You ever hear of spontaneous remission? Or misdiagnosis? You have proof that in that single case you cite the diagnosis was correct? On rare occasions, even cancer can inexplicably disappear (although most testimonials for quack cancer remedies are based on faulty original diagnosis or simultaneous administration of effective treatment). quackwatch.org