SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (109560)4/16/2005 10:42:46 AM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793684
 
Telling the NYT, "you can have an exclusive as long as you print our side of the story only" - and having the NYT agree! speaks volumes about the nature of the comments they were expecting from the other interested parties.

Isn't the NYT owned by people of the Jewish faith?



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (109560)4/16/2005 11:46:24 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793684
 
Whatever the NYTimes did or did not do is not particularly relevant to what happened at Columbia in terms of the alleged incidents and the report.

As for Said's influence on the department, I think that's terrific. If counter influence is important to you, there's plenty of counter influence around the University. Makes sense to have some place in which the Palestinian story gets into the picture.

So long as students are not graded on ideological grounds and faculty members encourage multiple points of view, and are open about their own, that's good education.