Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (109572)	4/16/2005 7:48:17 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793801

Why don't we refer to it pro-choice by what it really is? We already do. You just don't relate to the notion of choice as the controlling priority. If we were to apply your approach to the "pro-life" label, we would end up with "anti-choice" because, from a freedom perspective, that's "what it really is." We're looking at it from two different angles. The labeling that became accepted was to let each side label from its own angle. But some people resist even this small display of mutual acknowledgement...

To: unclewest who wrote (109572)	4/16/2005 10:38:27 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793801

You havent changed at all, have you Mike. You can be pro-choice for a women without being for abortion as the choice. In a perfect world there would be no abortions but in a perfect world, there wouldnt be AIDS, rape, poverty and illiteracy to name a few. Set up a foundation at your expense to adopt all of the prospective abortions and pay for it out of your own pocket if you feel so strongly about this. Mike