SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Done, gone. who wrote (8064)4/16/2005 11:04:58 AM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
As I posted before, I'm proud of the ignores.

Most are from bigots on political threads. Michal did you put me on ignore?

As I've also posted before, most who claim to "ignore" read every post.

Some of the well respected posters here have the following ignores

Pluvia 75
Truthseeker 104

Not that I need to defend myself in this crowd, but I've generated both ignores and lots of people marks. I'm consistently one of the top 10 people marks created in the past 90 days.

siliconinvestor.com

I know you'd like me to stop posting here. This is the tactic that used to work during the days that followers of the gurus dominated these boards. Most of the posters here whining, pissing and moaning about my posts were ardent followers, opposing the mere mention that shorts might do something scammy.

Yet they tolerate and even encourage off topic posts about people who have a different point of view.

They attack Olivier, raven, people they think might be pugs, people they think might know pugs, anyone that merely posts in opposition to what used to be a party line. They talk about obsession yet have lives dominated by pugs, by ancient articles about long gone touts, and foam at the mouth when dear shortie hedgies are discussed.

The conviction and all the weeping and false prophecy of both innocence and good motivation turned that all around. We've had many posters here who want to give both sides to these issues and I hope that continues.



To: Done, gone. who wrote (8064)4/16/2005 11:15:54 AM
From: Bear Down  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
you can have 69 then :)