You think falsely accusing people in public of extortion and blackmail is a laughing matter? Look, cretin, something tells me I'm already suing many of the multiple personalities posting here at SI, so don't concern yourself. If, however, Berber and Moor counsel try it, then that will be another matter, which I've made very clear would certainly be addressed in no uncertain terms in an appropriate judicial forum.
So, what have we here:
* First send threatening letters through counsel to the trader attempting to intimidate him;
* Next, try to ruin the trader with completely fraudulent tax assessments, civil rights violations, destroyed credit and countless public defamatory statements;
* Then commit perjury in state and federal court, destroying documents all that time, lying to Congress and SEC, defame the trader through frivolous sanctions, injunctions and vexatious litigant motions, and file completely false statements about his litigation being pursued "all to no avail," at the same time filing the trader's father's social security number in open court, the trader warns of further litigation if it's not immediately removed, then remove it from the record;
* Then an e-mail proving the allegations is filed in Court; scrupulously do not address it, ever;
* Then make frivolous proximate cause arguments in a federal court (in a rebuttal by the way, typical sandbag tactics), perhaps not realizing that this time the trader has learned a thing or two and has set up the defense for a major fall trying to abuse his pro se status, almost certainly not realizing that the Amended Complaint is modeled in some respects almost word- for-word after a Department of Justice RICO complaint recently filed against which even the Tobacco Defendants did not even attempt to file a motion for dismissal for failure to state a claim, knowing any such argument would have been completely frivolous;
* Then sweat it out for now almost five months wondering why the case has not been dismissed, let alone sanctions awarded; and, when all else fails..................
* Then, through multiple imposters, through a series of fake aliases and bogus e-mail addresses, attempt to concoct a case for extortion and blackmail against the trader.
Incredible cretins. Every time I think Berber and Moor cannot possibly sink to new lows, I'm confronted with more Machiavellian chicanery. And remember: this sorry excuse for a human being Berber, who deliberately destroyed thousands of people's lives, called himself Mother Teresa on national television, while at the same time lying to the entire country about his so-called charity. Let's see if a jury of our peers agrees with his self-assessment.
Incidentally, are any of you aware, speaking of racketeering allegations, that Berber's former counsel who withdrew from this action, Jenkens & Gilchrist, was sued for racketeering violations by its own clients, then settled that case for a cool $75 million after failing to compel arbitration or obtain dismissal, and that furthermore IRS sued Jenkens in federal court for setting up illegal offshore tax shelters, and when IRS took that action it invoked the crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege, thereby making criminal allegations? Since IRS was trying to collect taxes, and at the same time alleged crimes, maybe Loveman/Bear Down/Berber/Moor will also accuse IRS of extortion and blackmail? Maybe anyone who ever filed a RICO case in federal court should be accused of extortion and blackmail? Then again, maybe not, because last time I checked Philip Berber does not have the right to vote in the United States, so the RICO statute being revoked may not be in the cards just yet. |
