Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (156581)	4/16/2005 5:54:51 PM
From: dougSF30	Respond to of 275872

LOL!!! What's devastating is 2005 and 2006, for Intel.

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (156581)	4/16/2005 5:57:48 PM
From: KeithDust2000	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

ephud, If this is anywheres near correct Intel's Whitefield will outperform K9 in Integer, draw far less power and be available a year earlier! There´s quite a difference between "a year" and "a quarter" in my book, especially with schedules so far out.

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (156581)	4/16/2005 5:58:20 PM
From: mas_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

a quarter earlier (Q3/4-07) and yes, the merom/conroe/woodcrest/whitefield cores should be good ;-).

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (156581)	4/16/2005 6:16:45 PM
From: TechieGuy-alt	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

Makes you wonder why Intel will be keeping the P4 core alive in 2006 and 2007 when the higher IPC Yonah line cores will be "there"? TG

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (156581)	4/16/2005 10:28:18 PM
From: gzubeck	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Elmer...isn't whitefield over two years from now...don't you think there might be a few changes for AMD between now and then...