To: SilentZ who wrote (229531 ) 4/16/2005 6:49:32 PM From: tejek Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578643 I was talking about an exchange you and I had a week or two ago about why the Laci Peterson case became such a media circus, and I'd asserted it had something to do with the fact that putting Scott Peterson on trial for killing the fetus would set a dangerous (but enticing for the right) legal precedent. You disagreed. Taro threw it out as said legal precedent, and I was pointing that out to you. Oh my God, when did you start drinking? Last nite? In a million years, I would not have gotten that one. Frankly, I still believe that played a minor role. I think its an example of an 'it' couple.....yes, I know but its Fresno......that went amok near a major media center......Los Angeles. It didn't hurt that Scott, Laci and the affair girl were fairly photogenic. I hardly think the many millions of mostly American women who watched this media circus were turned on by the potential of a legal precedent. Rather, I think it was how handsome Scott was and the potential size of his peepee that played the bigger role. Of course, that's only my humble opinion. BTW Montreal is a great city. I used to go up there for fun and games when I was in school at Syracuse. Did I ever mention the story of the two girls that took my friend and I up to the top of the big hill in the middle of Montreal in order to seduce us? [Those Quebecois girls are trashiiiieeee! <g>] When we got to the top, there was this panaromic view of Montreal.....it was incredible. The girl I was with turned to the view, put her fingers together as if she were about to do the cross, and then kissed them saying: "Montreal, I love it more than my soul!" Turned me right on! <g> ted