Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Woodshed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nspolar who wrote (25982)	4/16/2005 8:11:46 PM
From: blind-geezer	Respond to of 60929

---Controversy is healthy as long we don't kill each other off over it.--- don't worry about that, if things keep going this way, we all get killed by the market before fellow shedders get a chance to take a whack at us <ggg>

To: nspolar who wrote (25982)	4/16/2005 8:24:31 PM
From: SwampDogg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 60929

OK too many on the same count. Must be wrong. His comment about the MACD not be oversold is silly. MACD may be good for a lot of things but that is not one of them. I am leaning more to a low higher than the May '04 low looking at some charts this weekend. Definitely need a bounce and then one more down though. safehaven.com

To: nspolar who wrote (25982)	4/16/2005 8:42:33 PM
From: SwampDogg	Respond to of 60929

Very messy but this could still be counted as being in a Wave 2 correction off the May '04 low. We would be in iii of v of C of a zig zag. That would mean a 3 of (5) coming up. The May '04 low would be a complete (4) I prefer the more obvious counts as I would much rather have a Wave 3 of higher degree on deck even if it means more downside. The juniors also point to the more obvious count. stockcharts.com[p,a]dicayyay[de][pb50!b200!i][vc60][iUb5!Lp14,3,3!La12,26,9!Lb14]&pref=G