Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (109756)	4/16/2005 8:47:54 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793838

You clearly think I misunderstood your original point but, for the life of me, I can't understand what about my own response was off target. The fine art of reading is taking a beating. This is quite simple, methinks. You said: I've never understood the argument that says her health should be ignored. And I said: The argument is that, if you leave an opening for her health, then every abortion will simply be declared to be "for her health," which I think is valid. And you said: And I don't think the argument is valid. And I said: What makes you think it's not valid? John, either "every abortion will simply be declared to be 'for her health'" is valid or it isn't. So you can tell me why you think it is invalid. Or you can go have that beer. Or both. Or you can tell me why this colloquy was so hard to follow... Your choice. <g>