Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits for Pros – moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom C who wrote (50)	4/16/2005 10:26:41 PM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 120

No broad characterizations. I look at the specific facts and the allegations. Take a look at some of the articles I've posted about naked shorting and hedge funds. Debate it, attack points. Instead, I got personal attacks. I've posted the history and you can check it with advanced search. BTW - here is my attempt to answer a moronic post to me from yardslave. Previously, yardslave had asked another poster why SI would pay a poster, totally missing the other poster's point. His posts got increasingly more rambling and I thought perhaps it was a mixing of posting and other errr mixings. Message 21234979 My attempt to answer him, after his several moronic posts to me was left unanswered. So a substantive post had no response. Name calling gets a response. As I said Tom, you butttted in where you have no knowledge of either me or the issues. That makes you at the very least a buttttinsky oooops was that a broad stroke???????? sorry

To: Tom C who wrote (50)	4/16/2005 10:27:52 PM
From: yardslave	Respond to of 120

OK..I'll try to be nicer to Ruffy.