Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (156613)	4/16/2005 11:50:21 PM
From: muzosi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

As for Intel - anything you can think of, Intel has a design for it in the works. Plus ones you can't think of roll time backwards 18-24 months, and say the same thing. now look into future and imagine dc opteron/athlon64. this exercise shows the fallacy of the above statement. a little humility goes a long way if one's ego lets one.

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (156613)	4/17/2005 8:44:20 AM
From: TechieGuy-alt	Respond to of 275872

I don't know if Intel has even confirmed there is such a thing as Whitefield. As for AMD, they have far less resources so the number of future designs they can work on is limited. They're a one trick pony at this point. A good trick but only one, imo. As for Intel - anything you can think of, Intel has a design for it in the works. Plus ones you can't think of. Yup. A few more Itaniums will definitely help Intel in competing with AMD and providing a high ROI to their shareholders. In fact, AMD's plan depend on Intel's shotgun-we-are-completely-confused-cannot-make-up-our-mind-as-what-to-do-is-anyone-really-in-charge-over-here approach! TG