SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (9397)4/17/2005 11:52:14 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Does Getler get it?

Power Line

Michael Getler is the ombudsman of the Washington Post. In today's column he turns to the story of the "GOP talking points memo" that we have written about at length on several occasions: "Getting blogged down in the news." Getler seems to me remarkably complacent about the Post's misreporting of the original story in each of its variations. Here's his conclusion:

<<<

As matters evolved, follow-up stories by Mike Allen on April 7 and 8 reported that the legal counsel to freshman Sen. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.) admitted that he was the author of the memo and that Martinez's office says it is investigating whether this aide distributed it to other Senate offices. So the memo was not a fake and did have a Republican origin. The degree of distribution has yet to be resolved, as does the issue of the original description in the news service and early printed edition version that it was distributed "by party leaders."
>>>

The degree of distribution has yet to be resolved? The finely worded story that appeared in the Post's final March 20 edition reported that the memo had been
"distribued only to Republican senators." We know now that the memo was not prepared by party leaders, contrary to the version of the story transmitted by the Post to its wire service on March 19, and that it was distributed by Republican Senator Mel Martinez to Democratic Senator Tom Harkin; we do not know of a single Republican senator to whom the memo was distributed.

Getler takes no account of the fact that if the memo had been described by the Post in a manner consistent with the known facts, it would hardly have merited a news story. I should think that at this late date both that the Post's ombudsman would be able to get the story straight and that he would have more to say about the quality of the Post's reporting on this important story. Or would that blog him down?

(Thanks to Tom Bevan of RealClearPolitics.)

UPDATE: Michelle Malkin provides a closer reading of Getler's column here.
michellemalkin.com

powerlineblog.com

washingtonpost.com

realclearpolitics.com



To: Sully- who wrote (9397)4/18/2005 11:32:34 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
KURTZ STILL SPINNING THE SCHIAVO MEMO

By Michelle Malkin
April 18, 2005 07:44 AM

You may be getting sick of the Schiavo memo, but Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz is still spinning the story.

In today's column, Kurtz cites the memo controversy after pointing out that a growing number of bloggers are engaging in unfair "personal attacks" on MSM reporters and commentators. Like Slate's Jack Shafer, washingtonpost.com's Terry Neal, and many liberal bloggers, Kurtz portrays this as a black-and-white case in which Post reporter Mike Allen got the story right and the conservative bloggers criticizing Allen got it wrong. He also falsely claims that some conservative bloggers did not back off from questions about the authenticity of the memo even after an aide to Sen. Mel Martinez admitted he wrote it:

<<<

When controversy erupted last month over what ABC's Douglass and The Post's Mike Allen described as a strategy memo given to Republican senators in the Terri Schiavo case, some conservative bloggers denounced the document as questionable, even fake. Not all backed off after GOP Sen. Mel Martinez of Florida admitted an aide had written the talking points.
>>>

Kurtz, Shafer, and Neal now focus exclusively on the authenticity of the memo rather than broader questions raised by bloggers about the accuracy of Allen's reporting. By contrast, the Post's ombudsman has admitted that the Post has not yet substantiated Allen's still-unretracted allegation that the memo was "distributed to Republican senators by party leaders."

michellemalkin.com

washingtonpost.com

slate.msn.com

washingtonpost.com

michellemalkin.com