Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (3512)	4/17/2005 2:52:33 PM
From: olivier asser	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

I've had some success but that's all prelude to Texas, where the main stage is. Encyclopedic yes but the key is boiling it down and I like what you said about trying the 5-minute encapsulation of the case. I've been working on that, for example a short and sweet opening statement, outlining the case in easily understandable concepts. No doubt, the defense tactic will be to make it as complex as possible, try to hide behind what they will claim to be gray areas and "technical." I guess you read Judge Aldisert too :-). That's right, in a way my job is to make it virtually impossible for the Court to rule any way except in my favor. If there's any overload, that becomes an exponentially higher mountain to climb. So, I'm leaving it to Berber and Moor to annoy the Court with voluminous filings. So far, we're talking maybe 5-1 in volume, their filings vs. mine. They no doubt expected me to respond as I did in EDVA and try to top them by filing 10x what they did, but not this time amigos, not falling for that twice... The problem is somehow getting your material into the box so that those who need the "cookie cutter" to see the final results will have no choice but to rule for you.