SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldworldnet who wrote (32612)4/19/2005 2:34:50 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 90947
 
"I'm all for law enforcement, but putting the whole country under surveillance is scary."

Don't get too up tight over that thought. The gov't simply
lacks the resources to effectively monitor everyones moves
at all times.

IMO, the worst case scenario is that they use existing
technology to flag potential criminal acts & act on them. It
might get you for some illegal moving violations, but how
many serious criminals would be thwarted if the technology is
properly used?

Sure it can & will be abused, like anything else throughout
history. And when that happens, we need to make sure that it
is severely punished & place appropriate checks & balances in
the system.



To: goldworldnet who wrote (32612)4/20/2005 1:26:46 AM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
Constitutionally, it's probably legal. In fact. it's happening. Cities are already installing cameras and sometimes listening devices in public places (including streets). It wii likely take new legislation to stop the trend.