SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (229867)4/19/2005 2:07:32 AM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1573912
 
I'll make my own statements by myself, and would recommend you take them for what they are and not try to extrapolate them into anything else

The question was not making a statement for you even by implication. I was primarily an actual question, not a rhetorical one.

Interesting. Seems very illogical, if its true.

At least inconsistent, unless the argument is that the woman's desire for the child is what determines if the fetus is a human life or not. I suspect few people would actually support that idea, so we are left with an inconsistency.

Tim



To: Elroy who wrote (229867)4/19/2005 8:17:02 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573912
 
"Interesting. Seems very illogical, if its true."

Not really. I don't know the details of California abortion laws, but most states don't allow abortions after the point of viability unless it impacts her health and well being as determined by her and her physician. Note that it doesn't say anything about an assailant being able to decide. It probably shouldn't. But that is just my opinion.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News