Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (3541)	4/19/2005 2:59:36 PM
From: ravenseye	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

I received this from the a@p_moderator "sorry, there's another board for conspiracy theories..." Unless you're the a@p_moderator your opinion is meaningless! I was enough of a threat the BATMAN defense team subpoenaed that SAME EVANS which was quashed! Your stories are much like thetruthseekers that make no sense! How many times did the man from mars pay you $5K worth of cheese for your cat and mouse games? lma(zz)o at access to the truth.... To: ravenseye who wrote (6256) 11/26/2004 1:02:11 PM From: TheTruthseeker Read Replies (1) of 6501 Tis true, Anthony@Pacific & TRUTHSEEKER did Expose Crims & Scammers!!! The DOJ also had my trading records. Facts are I have not trading in any stocks that Elgindy was involved in or traded in any stocks I had written about. Go back and do more DD. If you are accusing me of a crime spit it out son....... Message 20803239 Facts are your web foot prints don't agree with you. To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (0) 12/2/1998 11:20:00 PM From: Anthony@Pacific Read Replies (2) 109 of 91241 I Will be in Anaheim with a handful of fake business cards and wired for sound tomorrow in Anaheim checking out a few of the latest losers EGHT and SRCM to name a couple ,,I will be traveling with other fellow short-sellers and market gurus and expect to be gone from approximately 8am PST till midnight. But I will keep abreast of developments and will send a message if I see something that is notable..I expect to be completely awe-inspired by these Companies so they better not dissapoint me Message 6659818 To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (0) 12/3/1998 8:33:00 PM From: TheTruthseeker Read Replies (1) 146 of 91241 Anthony, I just wanted to thank you so much for giving me EGHT. I shorted it at $13 3/4 today and though I was disappointed it did not reach eight I am sure that it will go well below that in the next few days. I also shorted SRCM at $17 1/2 today. The pumpsters , scam artists and hooligans on the message board spreading their lies throughout the financial world need education Anthony. Please give us the reasons Anthony so that we may punish them for their sins "for they not know what they do". I have nicknamed SRCM "SCRAM" since this is what many investor will do when the learn the truth about this pathetic company. floyd Message 6675984

To: Janice Shell who wrote (3541)	4/19/2005 3:43:00 PM
From: scion	Respond to of 5425

Coke Settles Disclosure Action with SEC's Enforcement Division April 19, 2005 Yesterday, the SEC announced that Coke has settled an enforcement action relating to the company's failure to disclose certain end-of-quarter sales practices used to meet earnings expectations. In reaction to the SEC's action, Coke has already voluntarily taken steps to strengthen its internal disclosure review process. One aspect of this settlement to highlight was that even though Coke’s accounting treatment for sales made in connection with "gallon pushing" (i.e. a form of "channel stuffing" in the beverage industry) was found to be without issue, the SEC still found that the company's failure to disclose the impact of gallon pushing on current and future earnings in MD&A, as well as the false statements and omissions in a subsequent Form 8-K, violated the antifraud and periodic reporting requirements. In other words, this is not a financial fraud case; it's a disclosure one. thecorporatecounsel.net

To: Janice Shell who wrote (3541)	4/19/2005 3:56:54 PM
From: scion	Respond to of 5425

SEC's Advisory Committee on Smaller Public Companies Meets For 1st Time April 18, 2005 Last week, the SEC’s Advisory Committee on Smaller Public Companies met for the first time. The members were sworn in and other administrative and organizational matters were taken care of, such as the approval of by-laws and a determination of a master schedule for the Advisory Committee. Unlike past SEC Advisory Committees (ie. pre-Information Age), it appears that we will be able to closely follow the developments of this Advisory Committee and that they will be moving quickly to fulfill their mandate. Check out the Committee's webpage on the SEC’s website, which provides access to the charter, webcast archive of its first meeting and written statements received in advance of its first meeting. thecorporatecounsel.net