SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Madharry who wrote (21146)4/19/2005 10:35:17 PM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78954
 
OT: Madharry. If I had one stock I preferred over all others, I'd be plenty scared.

Largest buy position amount would be maybe 5% with that position likely lagged into over time. As regards holding vs. buying, in some smaller portfolios, I've been willing to hold all of a position even as that one position has increased to maybe about 14% of the portfolio's value. At some point though, I will scare myself into believing that it's prudent to trim and move on. (Which differs from the Buffett, et. al. approach which says - if you've picked the right stock, why sell? Or -- even if the stock is moderately overvalued, if it's a good moat stock with good future, again - such stocks are hard to find, and so once more - why sell?)

Perhaps it's a matter of purpose and goals. I am not looking for one stock upon which to place my future - I don't need a do or die bet. It's not necessary for me to find the one stock, the profit from which will enable a lifestyle change for me. I see investing as a long term process, so I don't feel I need to make a big bet on any one particular stock. Plus, given that I am wrong a lot, especially where I initially believed I was so right, I am leery of big bets.

Jmo and my nature. Others will differ.
-------------
How about yourself?



To: Madharry who wrote (21146)4/20/2005 11:37:21 AM
From: Kevyn Collins-Thompson  Respond to of 78954
 
If I do find an outstanding value, which happens very rarely, I buy as much as I can. Otherwise, I don't buy. When I've found a company that I've thoroughly researched in a business I understand, at a low price against my valuation model, the risk factor is small and I feel confident in the purchase. I mean, why put the money somewhere worse? ;-) In real terms, this can be up to 25% of my portfolio, although it's typically around 10%. It won't ever be 100% because I do reserve about 25% cash for when the market tanks and I want to buy, and of course I have existing investments I don't want to sell. In my experience, taking meaningful positions in a company forces me to do my homework and also forces me to play for as large a margin of safety as possible, e.g. waiting patiently for a good price. There is a broad diversity component in my decision-making across economic sectors. This approach isn't for everyone naturally, but if I didn't do it, the next best thing in my opinion would be the other extreme, e.g. a cheap index fund.



To: Madharry who wrote (21146)4/20/2005 2:41:24 PM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman  Respond to of 78954
 
for me? 2.5% initial buy, when it grows and the % edges out others, I'm fine with it holding a higher percentage

I believe in diversification

balance

value

and not having all your cookies in one basket

that goes for stocks too

asset distribution:

.33 in stocks

.33 in RE

.33 in bonds, mm, cash

you will generally have at least one foot in the winners circle