SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (305565)4/20/2005 12:57:33 AM
From: Bid Buster  Respond to of 436258
 
Why are you so surprised?

Aren't most government employees republican?



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (305565)4/20/2005 3:36:05 AM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
the difference between the private and government screeners was statistically significant but still slight.

So what is the big deal here?

Inspection is a subject I have followed closely for many years. The reports I have read, and the experience I have, show that an operator can effectively screen material for about 30 to 45 minutes. After that they need a break for at least 5 minutes.

The report I heard is thus. A screener at an airport X-Ray machine (with suitable training) will screen out guns and explosives for 30 to 45 minutes, after which there is an ever increasing probability that you can put in the proverbial Thompson machine gun in a cello-case and it will still pass inspection.

The tommy-gun-in-the-cello-case ploy probably worked for about a week

auto-ordnance.com

Most jobs in the USA and UK have inspection procedures that require operators to inspect for periods far in excess of 45 minutes.