Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rink who wrote (157056)	4/20/2005 12:41:24 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Rink You rather conveniently forgot that notebook processors are made in the same fabs as all other 90nm processors I didn't conveniently forget anything. I missed it. What is the point you're trying to make? That Intel has bad yields? I'm not going to get specific but if that's what you're trying to say I'd like to see how you come to that conclusion. About flash: You're right that there is no hard data. You're wrong in implying that means that Intel makes a profit on flash. Where have I claimed or implied that? I've challenged those who claim Intel loses money when they have no data to support that claim. Why aren't you questioning them instead of me. I've made no claim, at least not this year. The last time I said Intel made money in flash was when I quoted them. Your interpretation of previously posted Intel data conveniently ignores all the other divisions that operated under that same Group (ICG) and attempts to assign all the loss to Flash. That's nonsense but it supports the need here to believe that Intel is dumping Flash for the sole purpose of harming AMD, again nonsense.