SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: NOW who wrote (73285)4/21/2005 12:54:01 PM
From: jackielalanne  Respond to of 89467
 
tooearly, that does indeed tie right into the Naomi Klein article... thank you for posting it. No doubt in my mind, we have the most abusive and unethical leadership in modern history. They're even arming malitia's in Iraq now...

U.S. Funding Iraqi Militias Led by Baathists As Part of Counter-Insurgency Operation
Listen/watch: democracynow.org

Thursday April 21, 2005
We talk to Arun Gupta of The Indypendent on the proliferation of illegal militias in Iraq. The U.S. government is not only aware of these militias but is arming, training and funding them for use in their counter-insurgency operations. [includes rush transcript] We are joined in our studio by Arun Gupta who has been reporting on the proliferation of militias in Iraq. Arun is an editor with the New York City Independent Media Center's newspaper, The Indypendent.

He writes in his article, "Let A Thousand Militias Bloom" that the U.S. government is not only aware of these illegal militias but is arming, training and funding them for use in their counter-insurgency operations. His article will be in the May issue of Z magazine.

The article begins:

In devising a strategy to defeat Iraq’s insurgents, the Pentagon may be gaining the upper hand but at the cost of pushing Iraq toward civil war. A report by the Wall Street Journal from Feb. 16 revealed that “pop-up militias” are proliferating in Iraq. Not only is the U.S. aware of these illegal militias, but the Pentagon is arming, training and funding them for use them in counter-insurgency operations.

Most disturbing, one militia in particular – the “special police commandos” – is being used throughout Iraq and has been singled out by a U.S. general as conducting death squad strikes known as the “Salvador option.”

Greg Jaffe, the Journal reporter, identified at least six such militias. Yet these militias owe their allegiance not to the Iraqi people or state, but to their self-appointed leaders and associated politicians such as interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi. Even the commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, Gen. John P. Abizaid, admitted to Congress on March 1 that such militias are “destabilizing.”

Of these militias, at least three are linked to Allawi. Jaffe writes, “First came the Muthana Brigade, a unit formed by the order of… Allawi.” The second is the Defenders of Khadamiya, referring to a Shiite shrine on the outskirts of Baghdad, which appears to be “closely aligned with prominent Shiite cleric Hussein al Sadr,” who ran on Allawi’s ticket in the January elections.
• Arun Gupta, former editor of The Guardian, one of the most respected independent newspapers in recent U.S. history. He is currently an editor with the New York City Independent Media Center's newspaper, The Indypendent.
RUSH TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is available free of charge, however donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate - $25, $50, $100, more...

AMY GOODMAN: Well, finally, we're joined in the studio by Arun Gupta, who has been reporting on the proliferation of militias in Iraq. Arun is an editor with the New York City Independent Media Center's newspaper, The Indypendent. He writes in his article that the U.S. government is not only aware of these illegal militias, but is arming, training and funding them for use in their counter-insurgency operations. His article will be in the May issue of Z magazine. And we welcome you to Democracy Now!

ARUN GUPTA: Thank you.

AMY GOODMAN: Talk about what’s happening.

ARUN GUPTA: Well, these militias, which the government, the U.S. government is referring to as pop-up militias first came to prominence a couple of months ago in a report in the Wall Street Journal. This Journal reporter Greg Jaffe noted that these militias are appearing all over Iraq. And he was interviewing various members of a General Petraeus's staff. General Petraeus is the U.S. general and head of training all security services in Iraq. And it was presented as like, gee, all these militias are starting to appear all over Baghdad, militias with names like the Muthanna Brigade, the Defenders of Khadamiya, and the special police commandos. And Petraeus's staff was interested in funding and supporting these, but what it really appears to be turning out that these have been set up in secret with the U.S. government's knowledge all along and that in many instances these militias are actually ex-Ba'athists, many of the thugs who served under Saddam Hussein in his notorious intelligence services, and they are being deployed extensively throughout Iraq in counter-insurgency operations. They have also been implicated in death squad operations known as the “Salvador option,” and they also appear to be using torture extensively throughout Iraq, so it's a very unseemly situation. What essentially the U.S. is trying to do is privatize, is outsource these militias and provide itself with cover, but the whole time it's actually funding and creating these militias apparently.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Now, your article seems to indicate also that the militias have been having some effect on the resistance in that the actual -- just by counting the toll of American soldiers, that there's been a reduction in recent months of the actual number of American soldiers killed. Could you talk about that?

ARUN GUPTA: Yes. The peek number of U.S. soldiers killed in combat was last November, during the sacking of Fallujah. 126 U.S. soldiers died in combat. By this past March, it had fallen by 75%. So, going on that and U.S. casualties, in general, it appears that there is some success. They're using these militias extensively in the so-called Sunni Triangle area: Baghdad, Mosul, Samarra, Tikrit, Ramadi. And what it appears to be, according to Jane's Intelligence Digest is that they're using ex-Ba'athists to hunt down their former colleagues who are directing much of the insurgency. So they're -- the U.S. is saying, like, well, these are a bunch of Ba'athist dead-enders in the insurgency, but at the same time they're using the ex-Ba'athists themselves, who they said they were freeing Iraq from, to hunt down insurgents. But they are also just rounding people up willy-nilly, and there appears, like I said, to be extensive use of torture, much of it coming from this TV show that is now appearing on Iraq called, Terror: The Grip of Justice. There have been many accounts of this in the media, where a number of times a week on this television station set up by the Pentagon, Al-Iraqiya, they parade insurgents before the TV. And these reports are all noting that the suspects have swollen faces, bruised, that they're very cowed. And they're also admitting to the most absurd charges, that they are participating in gay orgies, that they get drunk inside mosques, that they're pedophiles engaging in rape, that they practice beheadings by cutting off the head of sheep. And the interesting thing is, one commentator noted, it's the exact same tactic Saddam Hussein used under his government of airing televised confessions.

And there’s one Ba'athist in particular who is at very much the center of this. It's a General Adnan Thavit, who was involved in the 1996 coup against Saddam Hussein that the former interim prime minister who just resigned, Iyad Allawi, headed up. And this character Thavit keeps popping up all over the place. He is the head of the special police commandos, which are said to number ten to eleven thousand, which would actually make them the second largest security force in Iraq, larger than the British. He was also the source for this raid a few weeks ago on this insurgent camp on Lake Tharthar, that turned out to be bogus pretty much. A reporter went there and found that there were all these insurgents still there, even though Thavit was saying something like 85 insurgents were killed. He is also now involved in this dispute over what's going on in this town south of Baghdad, claiming there wasn't any kidnapping and now there's reports of these bodies being dragged out of the river. And the Interior mMnistry a couple of days ago even said he was assassinated, and then retracted the report the same day. He is a very shady character, and the U.S. general staff under Petraeus notes that he's very powerful, and that if he is removed, he could take his militias with him, this huge force. And right now, there's a power struggle going on. Donald Rumsfeld flew into Baghdad last week and warned the new government not to purge these Ba'athists. This largely escaped the notice of many in the media. And Talabani, who is the new president, has said that, no, we are going to purge them, and we want to use our militias.

AMY GOODMAN: Arun Gupta, we want to thank you very much for being with us. If people want to read this article, where can they go on the web?

ARUN GUPTA: They can go to Z magazine. They can also go to the New York City IndyMedia Center, nyc.indymedia.org where it will be appearing.

AMY GOODMAN: Thank you so much. The piece is called, “Let a Thousand Militias Bloom.”



To: NOW who wrote (73285)5/2/2005 1:19:37 PM
From: jackielalanne  Respond to of 89467
 
Tsunami survivors face new threat
Land developers evicting villagers from wave-hit sites

Monday, May 2, 2005 Posted: 4:01 AM EDT (0801 GMT)
cnn.com


Yuphin Chotipraphatsorn stands in the place where her home used to be.

BAN NAM KHEM, Thailand (AP) -- Still reeling from the loss of her two sons, sister and brother-in-law to the tsunami, Yuphin Chotipraphatsorn is facing another disaster: Developers want to take away all she has left -- the land where her house once stood and her family lived.

She is among thousands of Thais in the six provinces hit by December's deadly waves now threatened with eviction from land the government or private enterprises claim is not theirs.

Many say they could lose property or homes where their families lived for decades, if not centuries.

"If the tsunami didn't take you away, I will," the 36-year-old Yuphin recalled hearing from a stranger she thinks was sent by a land development company as he warned her and other villagers to move off the site in Ban Nam Khem, which is still a landscape of rubble, wrecked houses and beached boats.

"The tsunami swept away our houses, but the second tsunami is worse because it's going to take away our land," said Chaweang Kaew-ead, a 45-year-old construction worker in this poor fishing village where some 200 people face eviction.

The villagers and activists say the developer, Far East Trading and Construction Co, is taking advantage of the tsunami's destruction to oust them and build hotels for sun-worshipping Westerners and Asians.

In a dispute common in Thailand, businessmen counter that villagers illegally encroached on their land.

At Ban Nam Khem, in the worst-hit area of the coast north of Phuket island, company lawyer Niwat Kaewluan said Far East Trading plans to build a resort on land he contends is illegally occupied by villagers.

The company bought the land from a mining firm, Hok Chong Seng Co, a few years after it stopped work in the area, Niwat said. It's unclear when the purchase was made, but Far East Trading began forcing some villagers off the land in 2002.

Some villagers say they have lived in Ban Nam Khem for more than 30 years -- before the Hok Chong Seng Company was granted a mining concession in the late 1970s.

They possess no title deeds. But under Thai law those settled for more than a year on a certain classification of land, under which most of the village falls, can claim ownership.

As in similar cases, many of the 200 facing eviction had already taken the dispute to court before the tsunami struck December 26, killing more than 5,300 Thais and foreign tourists in the south.

As the court battle ensued, the company threw fences around some homes to force residents out, and threats were made.

The villagers say the company brought in backhoes to pull down houses or clear away and bury wrecked ones, saying they had no right to live there.

"They put up concrete poles, strung wire and prevented villagers from entering the area right after the tsunami occurred," said Yuphin, who recalled how she was trying to find her missing family members at the time.

Intimidation has been incessant

The company also posted a sign that read, "No Trespassing or Construction of Any Sort."

"I asked myself, `Why couldn't I get into the fenced off areas to search for the bodies of my loved ones?"' she said, tears in her eyes. Only the body of her sister was eventually recovered.

The government has offered to build new houses for tsunami victims who lost their homes, but villagers without land deeds don't qualify.

"I sometimes doubt if I am a Thai citizen since I haven't received any help from the government," said Weera Bunruang, a construction worker who said he lost six of his 10 family members.

Intimidation has been incessant. Recently, five men fired gunshots into the air to scare away Thais and foreign volunteers who came to help residents rebuild their houses, the villagers said.

But the villagers are determined to stop the company.

The government has instructed officials to inspect the disputed land and find a compromise, but Sunee Hathatham, an official in the Land Department in Phang Nga province, predicted the fight would have to be settled in court.

"The total loss from the tsunami has given us courage to stand up and fight because we have nothing to lose," said Yuphin, turning to look at what is left of her house -- a concrete foundation.

"Where do they want us to go?" she added. "Our families died here and we feel deeply attached to this place."

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



To: NOW who wrote (73285)5/18/2005 7:10:54 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
NEWS: Voters dissatisfied with Bush, Congress; NBC/WSJ poll reveals 'angry electorate'

By Mark Murray
Political reporter
NBC News
Updated: 6:39 p.m. ET May 18, 2005

WASHINGTON - As the Senate marches closer toward a nuclear showdown over President Bush’s judicial nominees, the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll finds that the American public is dissatisfied — with Congress and its priorities, with Bush’s plan to overhaul Social Security and with the nation’s economy and general direction. Moreover, a majority believes that the Senate should make its own decision about the president’s judicial nominees, rather than just generally confirming them.

And while all of this might suggest bad news for Republicans, since the political party in charge often gets blamed when things aren’t going well, the survey also indicates that the public isn’t quite embracing the Democrats either. “It is just a sense of unhappiness with where we’re at,” said Democratic pollster Peter D. Hart, who conducted this survey with Republican pollster Bill McInturff.

Perhaps the most revealing finding in the poll is the attitude toward Congress. Just 33 percent of the respondents approve of Congress’ job. That’s down 6 points since a poll in April and 8 points since January.

“The public is exceptionally displeased with the Congress,” Hart said. “It is [its] lowest set of numbers since May of 1994,” the year when congressional Republicans defeated their Democratic counterparts in the midterm elections to take control of both the House and Senate. According to this poll, by 47 percent to 40 percent the public says it would prefer Democrats controlling Congress after the 2006 elections.

Congress has wrong priorities
McInturff, the GOP pollster, points out that Americans are upset with Congress focusing on the battle over judges, Social Security, trying to restore Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube and the ethical troubles surrounding their members, including Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Texas, instead of focusing on the economy, gas prices and health care.

“There are some core day-to-day issues that they don’t see being addressed,” he said. “The people want us to head in a different direction and hear different things.”

Still, McInturff argues, it’s much too early to predict that the Democrats will overtake the Republicans in the 2006 elections. “There is a difference between dissatisfaction and being a viable [replacement]. And we have a long way to go to 2006,” he said.

The survey, which polled 1,005 adults from May 12-16 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, also has some troubling findings for President Bush. Just 20 percent of those polled say the economy has gotten better over the past 12 months, an 11- point decline since January; 51 percent believe that removing Saddam Hussein from power was not worth the cost and casualties of that war; and only 36 percent support Bush’s plan to allow workers to invest their Social Security contributions in the stock market.

Most don't support how judges are confirmed
That Social Security figure, which is virtually unchanged from April, is significant because it suggests that Bush hasn’t moved the country any closer to supporting private accounts despite his months-long campaign for them.

Regarding the contentious debate over Bush’s judicial nominees, just 34 percent say the Senate should generally confirm the president’s judicial picks as long as they are honest and competent, while 56 percent argue that the Senate should make its own decision about the fitness of each nominee to serve.

Overall, according to the NBC/Journal poll, 52 percent believe the nation is headed in the wrong direction, while 35 percent think it’s on the right track.

All of these findings, Hart says, are signs of an angry electorate. “If you are a member of Congress and you got the poll back, you better be looking over your shoulder,” he said. “The masses are not happy.”

URL: msnbc.msn.com