Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (160791)	4/21/2005 8:05:51 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

No one would count as zionist support when they didn't support zionism ... duh ... quite a number of resident jews did not like masses of foreigners coming in and buggering everything up, and they emphatically did not support zionism ... there were some among the various communities who did to some extent support zionism, even some arabs surprisingly, but this was mostly early on, probably not far into the twenties Always there were far more muslim arab-speakers than zionists plus resident jews plus other communities combined ... far more Arabs moving in were not doing so in an attempt to impose a new form of Excludostaat based on a religion they perceived hostile to their own ... they came as individuals, lived within the system, theirs was not a new mass subjugate-the-other effort coming in from offshore There was another reason for the change you mention, though - the lack of good records on the arab side ... zionists of course had been keeping all sorts of records, being european in habits as well, and of course being the writers got to make sure they didn't lose advantage in the records department, if you know what i mean.