SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (42637)4/22/2005 1:42:49 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
The New York Daily News yesterday reported that Democratic Sens. Byron L. Dorgan of North Dakota and John Kerry of Massachusetts were trying to kill a legal probe implicating senior Clinton administration appointees for obstruction of justice.
    The lawmakers Tuesday attached an amendment to a spending bill, which passed the Senate yesterday, to cut off funding for independent counsel David Barrett's 10-year-old investigation of Henry Cisneros, former Housing and Urban Development secretary.
    The lawmakers said Mr. Cisneros paid a $10,000 fine in 1999 for lying to the FBI about payments to a mistress and that former President Bill Clinton pardoned him — so the probe "should have ended years ago."
    Sources told the paper the legislation will thwart Mr. Barrett's attempts to make a 400-page final report public. They said the report will accuse former Clinton officials at the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service of using their positions to attack Clinton critics and cover up possible criminal deeds.
    "It's about obstruction of justice. People are willing to take drastic actions to kill this report," one source said.
    Differences between the House and Senate spending bills for U.S. operations in Iraq and Afghanistan still must be resolved in a conference committee.



To: American Spirit who wrote (42637)4/22/2005 5:37:28 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
AS, you are irrelevant. How did you ever get to be the most ignored person on SI? (Actually, you may not be, but you would be hard to beat, with over 200 ignores.) Was it because you are so consistently irrelevant and incorrect while accusing others of your vices? It would probably be a safe bet.

Speaking of vices. How is it that you are so good at spotting gays?