SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve dietrich who wrote (160892)4/22/2005 2:49:07 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
UN had the protectorate. There were no states in the area at that time. Just the protectorate of Palestine. It was their decision to make. Now ask me if the Dutch wanted NY back would i accept the decision of the World Court, you putz.



To: steve dietrich who wrote (160892)4/22/2005 4:14:27 PM
From: cnyndwllr  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Steve, re: If the U.N. voted for a partitioning in Texas or California, because resident Mexicans wanted to establish their own country here, I wouldn't accept the U.N.'s decision either, would you?

Yes, with respect to Texas. That is, if the Mexicans would close off their borders and keep our resident "Texans" locked in. Of course we run the risk that after a few years they'd try to give it back. Ed


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News