Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sawdusty who wrote (4679)	4/22/2005 8:04:10 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Respond to of 37904

Sarge The Liberal Party on a good day represents some 40% of the Canadian electorate... Ontario is the stronghold... How do the other 60% feel especially when they are concentrated regionally ? This is no different than when Quebec was the stronghold and Ontario was more evenly balanced between the Liberal and old PC party.. Not a good recipe. Kastel EDIT I bet this gives Dalton some leverage finally... LOL..

To: Sawdusty who wrote (4679)	4/22/2005 11:10:02 PM
From: Gulo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37904

Is a viable alternative not a prerequisite for change Gulo, or do you advocate change for the sake of change? Change for the sake of change?! Oh come on! Do you think dismantling a corrupt administration is "change for the sake of change"? The way I see it, if my feet are on hot coals, I move. I'm not too picky as to where I move, but I would move quickly. I wouldn't wait to see if there is a particularly nice place to go. And I certainly would not wait to see if the coals really meant to burn my feet. Any place that isn't dangerous is a "viable alternative". I don't think a first administration of any party could be worse than the rotten scoundrels we are infested with now. -g