Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (62574)	4/23/2005 10:11:39 AM
From: shades	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

So we have more kids so that our DNA gets passed in less healthy environments - ok I agree - seems a very rational point - but I am reading way too many economists and future projections in japans, germany, usa that we really BLEW IT in the baby squirting department - nature reinfornced a long term societal destructive action. Couldn't the smart economists of yesteryear plug in the numbers and see that we needed more babies to fund SS and the future? Couldn't our policy makers make laws and economic incentives for family units to produce productive economic output units that paid taxes - couldn't the schools teach home economics instead of saying no no no - that is for slave women and our society is free. Down with home ec, down with baby squirting, down with the future of japanese, germans, americans - hehe.