SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (42855)4/23/2005 1:01:11 PM
From: 10K a day  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
dude i think the gay talk is discounted immediately. i think there is plenty of other issues to just hammer away at their balls..it's kind of like which bigot do i pound on next...it's like easy pickin's and a tulip walk...



To: American Spirit who wrote (42855)4/23/2005 1:16:14 PM
From: geode00  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
If the RNC is seen as it truly is, with as many gays as the Dems, it leaves all the gay issues pointing toward only one thing: Republicans as hypocrites.

Gay marriage, gay foster parents, gay adoption, etc. go away as dividing issues between the two parties. POOF!

We are then able to focus on what really matters: Republicans are fiscally irresponsible and will tax and spend the US into permanent debt to Communist China.

Whoops!

=================
On Saturday, the New York Times ran a story all about Finkelstein’s under-the-radar marriage to his partner of 40 years in Massachusetts back in December, in a private civil ceremony at his home. The Republican Party has been adamantly opposed to marriage equality for gays, but Finkelstein – who seemed to be trying to keep his three-month-old marriage under wraps – wanted the benefits that gay activists have won after years of battle against Jesse Helmses of the world.

Seemingly caught on the spot by a Times reporter who contacted him, Finkelstein said, "I believe that visitation rights, health care benefits and other human relationship contracts that are taken for granted by all married people should be available to partners.”

The contradiction of his working for the very people who fought actively against giving such rights to gay people seemed to be lost on him entirely, confirming that we’re dealing with a damaged, selfish cretin – and one who has become dangerous to the rest of us who are gay.http://signorile.com/articles/nyp139.html