SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (680688)4/26/2005 7:08:13 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"The poll found 66 percent of respondents opposed a possible rule change to eliminate procedural roadblocks known as filibusters against judicial nominees, while 26 percent supported the idea."

Yep, sounds like 2/3 AGAINST the idea to me. (Our founding fathers were very much concerned with preventing 'mob rule' by a simple majority... which is why they made such an effort to carefully devise limitations on the power of a majority, and why we have a republican form of government, not a pure democracy where majority rules. This poll result sounds consistent with that historical understanding to me....)

"Word the question like this: 'Are for or against CHANGING the Senate rules for advice and consent on Judicial nominations to allow a minority to filibuster nominees in committee thus disallowing a full vote in the Senate.' And see what the answer would be."

I'm SURE some polling organization will... and then you will be able to directly compare the results.



To: JDN who wrote (680688)4/26/2005 7:12:51 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
What was most interesting to me was the break down of the opposition to changing the rules to increase the power of a simple majority to force through it's will:

"Nearly half of Republicans surveyed in the poll were against any rule changes, along with eight in 10 Democrats and seven in 10 independents."