Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (8201)	4/27/2005 4:15:56 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Hey, Jeffrey, how come you intentionally failed to include yourself on that list you posted of most ignored people? You should clearly be included high up on that list, you have 13 ignores with just barely 200 peoplemarks? Are you trying to hide the true stats? Isn't that dishonest? I think so... what kind of deception are you trying to pull here? You can't fool anyone, people are clearly smarter than you think... I come to this thread for an honest discussion of the thread topic and the host is perpetrating some kind of deception... let me give you some free advice, you only lost all credibility and made a mockery of yourself by doing such a dumb and foolish thing, a shame on you... naughty, naughty, go figure... GZ

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (8201)	4/27/2005 5:40:59 AM
From: Vendit™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12465

You would land at number 23 on that list with 13 ignores. Why did you leave yourself off of the list? Member 2894769 Your list: Message 21236252 Your ignore ratio is 0.0634146.

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (8201)	4/27/2005 11:09:16 AM
From: SI Dave	Respond to of 12465

We don't publish lists of negative metrics like "most banned" and "most ignored" since it becomes a magnet for adolescent hooligans who want to either make it onto the list themselves or campaign to get others on it. EDIT: It seems that at least a couple of persons generically referred to above have rather conveniently offered themselves as poster children for why we don't publish those lists.