Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (111432)	4/27/2005 9:15:15 AM
From: unclewest	Respond to of 793858

General Brown's proposal to add 125 men to SF ranks each year for four years may be doable. Notice he did add a caveat when he said, "About." It will not be easy. We have only been able to sustain current SF force levels by curtailing retirements and involuntarily extending enlistments. Current SF reenlistment bonuses are as high as $150,000 and we don't yet know if that is enough. Kerry's proposal to add 5,000 Green Berets immediately was the impossible dream for an outfit that often accepts impossible missions. uw Special ops to increase force strength to meet terror war demands By Donna Miles American Forces Press Service WASHINGTON (American Forces Press Service, April 25, 2005) — With the war on terror putting ever-increasing demands on special operations forces, U.S. Special Operations Command is boosting its manpower and increasing its support to theater commands and geographic commanders, according to the general who oversees this elite force. Since Sept. 11, 2001, the command has become the Defense Department’s lead in fighting terror, Army Gen. Bryan Brown, commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, told the Senate Armed Services Committee’s emerging threats and capabilities subcommittee April 22. Special operations forces have applied their direct-action capability to capture or kill terrorists far forward, specifically in Afghanistan and Iraq, Brown said. At the same time, the command is carrying out a wide range of other missions: helping other countries’ militaries become more capable, eliminating the root causes of terrorism through civil affairs activities, and discouraging participation in terrorist groups through psychological operations efforts. To help meet these challenges, U.S. Special Operations Command plans to increase its force strength by more than 23,000 troops in the next four years, Brown said. This increase will affect Special Forces, civil affairs, psychological operations, aviation, and Navy special warfare forces, and will include the equivalent of two SEAL teams and about 500 Special Forces troops, he explained. While boosting force levels, the command is also counting on retention initiatives to help decrease attrition from the ranks, Brown said. These incentives include targeted bonuses for specific specialties and educational benefits. Thomas O’Connell, assistant secretary of defense for special operations and low-intensity conflict, told the subcommittee these initiatives underscore a basic tenet within the special operations community: that humans are more important than hardware. This mindset is particularly evident in the command’s efforts “to equip the man rather than man the equipment,” O’Connell said. The specialized capabilities special operations forces bring to the fight are proving invaluable as they take the lead in almost every aspect of the war on terror, he said. “We are emphasizing training, education and equipment systems that will ensure our (special operations forces) warriors have the technical and tactical skill, regional expertise, language proficiency and specialized equipment necessary to win this war,” Brown told the subcommittee. The war on terror is a long-term conflict that’s worldwide in scope and won’t end with al Qaeda, he said. “The enemy is patient, tenacious and dedicated in this fight, and we must be the same,” Brown said. “U.S. SOCOM is preparing for the long term.”

To: LindyBill who wrote (111432)	4/27/2005 1:15:22 PM
From: D. Long	Respond to of 793858

The better way to proceed is to make the filibuster radioactive politically by letting the Democrats talk themselves to death. Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves by their vocal cords I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. Let the Dems filibuster and make it a big publicity event. Once they've hung themselves sufficiently, nuke em if ya hafta. Derek