SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rick who wrote (49091)4/29/2005 3:36:44 AM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
Rick, I agree that the flexibility of the proposed changes are better that the system we have now. It also helps to keep some people from making bad decisions on where to invest.

It was quite a few years ago that what I thought was mentioned, so it is obvious that I read it wrong, or it changed under GW's administration.

I wish I could have had that option during my working years. The panic is being caused by the democrats in a vindictive way because they lost two elections that they thought they should win, and because the liberals are socialists at heart.



To: Rick who wrote (49091)4/30/2005 5:57:27 PM
From: Rick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59480
 
Jane Fonda in Wonderland
Non-apology not accepted.

By Dexter Lehtinen

"You may have heard that Jane Fonda apologized to Vietnam veterans in her current book. That's incorrect. She expressed "regret" for one photograph, but remains proud of her Radio Hanoi broadcasts, her efforts to achieve a Communist victory, and her attacks on American servicemen as war criminals. She never uses the word "apology."

Fonda’s latest foray into her past — with her pseudo-apology for having been photographed while sitting on a Communist North Vietnamese anti-aircraft gun, along with her continued vigorous defense of all other aspects of her trip to North Vietnam and her support for the North Vietnamese and Cambodian Communist wars — reminds us that apologies can be very tricky things. An unqualified apology offered with sincere regret for the full scope of the wrong by someone who recognizes the harm inflicted on others can help in reconciliation. But a "pseudo-apology," offered with limitations by someone who still defends the bulk of the wrong, only serves to aggravate the injury....."

nationalreview.com