Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JeffA who wrote (102440)	4/29/2005 9:55:14 AM
From: Oral Roberts	Respond to of 108807

And when you see the engineers of big time racing throwing their carbs away if allowed that might tell you something about efficiency also. CART, Formula 1 and IRL are all injected. Better burn because of atomization and delivery means more power which also translates into better milage for a street car. And the cold starting, etc are not even matched. In the early 80's when GM was just getting going with injection it was obvious to anyone who looked which system was better. Let see the 81 Bonneville got 17 mpg and the 83 with injection got 30. Hmmmm. Also when it snowed and we had to move vehicles on the car lot to plow I don't ever remember an injected car not starting. The Toronado's, 88's and 98's that were carbed wouldn't start if you walked by them with an ice cream cone in July and all got less the 18mpg.