SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (10552)5/3/2005 1:32:10 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 20039
 
Re: But remember, one of those planes was headed for the White House.

We are very close to the point where I'm going to decide that it is pointless to correspond with you. Look, there are elementary school children in America who can see through this canard.

What is real: A plane in Pennsylvania is heading toward the Washington metropolitan area. There are literally hundreds of targets for a suicide terrorist there. There is no communication from the hijackers as to what their intent is.

What is fraud: But a venal, obliging corporate media propaganda machine starts (or, more likely, regurgitates) a useful rumor ("plane headed for the White House") for eliciting fear in the general public and you naively fall for this lie?

How disappointing. No wonder that "Brown & Root" con man though he ought to work a swindle on you. You're gullible. White House, my ass.



To: American Spirit who wrote (10552)5/3/2005 2:35:03 PM
From: Don Earl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
RE: "But remember, one of those planes was headed for the White House."

As usual, you're making assumptions based on your lack of information. The truth is one of those planes flew directly over the White House, in order to then make a 270 turn to hit a hardened target, at a point where that hardened target had most recently been refortified.

RE: "I sincerely doubt Bush wanted the WH destroyed"

No kidding! So, what sort of "terrorist" passes up the ultimate terrorist target in the interest of maximizing political impact, while minimizing actual damages? The same question applies to the timing of the WTC attacks. What sort of "terrorist" attacks office buildings, with an occupancy of 50,000, at a quarter to 9 in the morning when three fourths of the occupants haven't arrived at work yet? What sort of half trillion dollar a year defense system tracks a hijacked plane for 56 minutes, while it makes a beeline for the nation's capital, without any armed response whatsoever, but within minutes of the strike, confiscates surveillance tapes from every camera in the area which would have captured the actual attack?

You aren't stupid, merely ignorant. From watching CNN, you've become inordinately proud of the fact you've figured out that nearly 2000 soldiers have been murdered in an illegal war, based entirely on fabricated evidence presented by criminals to the American public. What you haven't figured out is that even with the fabricated evidence, without 9/11 as a backdrop, the illegal invasions would have been flat out impossible to sell to the American public.

Try arming yourself with a few facts and using your head for a change. 9/11 was flat out impossible except as an inside job, and every person in a position to see the attacks carried out was a member of PNAC and was appointed to those positions by Bush