SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: energyplay who wrote (63435)5/4/2005 9:33:05 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
In the early 1900s they took the advanced view that the "Motor - Car" would be important and useful.

If they said Trams, Aircraft, or Trains I would have agreed they had advanced thinking.

Freeways and cars are a different matter though. Got "Who framed Roger Rabbit"?. It tells a story.

Judge Dooms conspiracy is base on a true story. In the 1930's, GM, Firestone Tires, Standard Oil, Phillips Petroleum, and Mack Trucks entered into a conspiracy to buy up trolleys nationwide and replace them with buses (running with there own products). The companies were convicted of violating the Sherman antitrust act in 1949 and fined $5000 each.

fast-rewind.com
saunalahti.fi

Have a look at the average freeway. How many railway lines could you put through the same space with more efficient use of engines, drivers, reduced pollution and costs?

The guys at the spectator look clueless by that comparison.




To: energyplay who wrote (63435)5/5/2005 2:25:30 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 74559
 
Re: The Spectator

Spectating? Frankly, I find the Sun's Page Three a lot more spectacular as well as bicameral. Not that I'm not interested in seeing Tony Bliar smashed into a puree suitable for a plate of scrod and mash in the East End. But... really... The Spectator? Isn't that uncomfortably close to the Barf-o-Lounger called the Telegraph UK in editorial incontinence?