Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (231644)	5/5/2005 3:45:34 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571690

Steve and Ted, Clinton is hardly faultless when it comes to North Korea. Having a lack of a policy (other than the status quo) when Carter went isn't an excuse. At the time Carter interceded, Clinton was getting ready to take a much stronger position with NK. Carter's intervention prevented that move. Carter had no right interceding unbidden onto the turf of another president. Besides, I don't think he was best equipped to deal with the problem. In fact, his behavior was outrageous. Clinton was very kind by not jumping all over him. ted