Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (231688)	5/5/2005 4:09:06 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576615

House Approves $82B for Iraq, Afghanistan By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer 11 minutes ago The House easily approved another $82 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan on Thursday, a measure that includes sweeping immigration reforms and boosts the total spent on fighting terrorism since 2001 to beyond $300 billion. The vote was 368-58, with one lawmaker abstaining. The Senate is to vote on the measure next week when it returns from a weeklong recess, and approval is expected. The bulk of the money — $75.9 billion — is slated for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, while $4.2 billion goes to foreign aid and other international relations programs worldwide. The bill also includes uniform requirements for driver's licenses across states, toughens asylum laws, authorizes the completion of a fence across the California-Mexican border and provides money to hire more border security agents. Both the Republican-controlled House and Senate had promised to "scrub" President Bush's request to cut spending for items that did not represent emergency spending needs. But the bill carries the same overall price tag that Bush proposed in February, and he gets most of what he sought. However, the bill also provides roughly $1 billion more than the president had requested for defense and about $1.5 billion less than he wanted for international relations programs, reflecting a desire by lawmakers to give the Pentagon what it needs while holding the line on State Department spending. "We did our very best to keep the package clean, and by and large we were successful at that," said Rep. Jerry Lewis (news, bio, voting record), R-Calif., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee. Rep. Tom Cole (news, bio, voting record), R-Okla., said the bill provides important money for troops overseas. "We owe them our full support in the battles they wage in the cause of liberty," he said. Democrats roundly criticized the Republican leadership for including the immigration reforms in a bill meant to cover the cost of war. They also assailed the administration's Iraq policies and railed against what they called a lack of oversight by Congress of money already given to the Republican administration for the two wars and reconstruction. "The president's rationale for the invasion was discredited long ago. Iraq is still not safe," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said. "Providing this money alone is not enough. A way out must be provided as well." Rep. David Obey (news, bio, voting record) of Wisconsin, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, said the bill fails to include checks and balances of U.S. funds flowing into Iraq, despite reports of financial mismanagement of money that Congress already has approved. "We have virtually been begging on bended knee to get this Congress to establish a committee to investigate this problem," he said. Hitting on immigration reforms in the bill, Rep. Louise McIntosh Slaughter (news, bio, voting record), D-N.Y., claimed that House GOP leaders "shoved this extreme measure down our throats." "Our brave men and women are being used as a tool" for the "underhanded attempt to create a national ID card," she said. The legislation is the fifth such emergency spending package Congress has taken up since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It pushes the costs of the two conflicts and other efforts to fight terrorism worldwide over four years beyond $300 billion. The bill includes a nearly tenfold increase in the one-time benefit for survivors of troops killed in combat zones — from $12,000 to $100,000. The increase would apply retroactively to families of troops killed in Iraq and Afghanistan beginning on Oct. 7, 2001. On the foreign affairs side, the measure provides $592 million for a sprawling embassy in Baghdad, $230 million for U.S. allies in the war on terror, and $200 million in economic and infrastructure assistance to the Palestinian Authority. The Pentagon has pressured lawmakers to pass the bill quickly, saying it would run out of money for wars by Thursday. But spokesman Lawrence Di Rita said the Pentagon has moved roughly $1 billion in funds from other accounts to pay for the war in anticipation of congressional delays in getting the new money. ___

To: tejek who wrote (231688)	5/14/2005 6:03:47 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576615

Re: evangelicals are estimated to be 35 million people in this country. For 13% of the population, they are being given too much consideration IMO. Earthly Empires How evangelical churches are borrowing from the business playbook There's no shortage of churches in Houston, deep in the heart of the Bible Belt. So it's surprising that the largest one in the city -- and in the entire country -- is tucked away in a depressed corner most Houstonians would never dream of visiting. Yet 30,000 people endure punishing traffic on the narrow roads leading to Lakewood Church every weekend to hear Pastor Joel Osteen deliver upbeat messages of hope. A youthful-looking 42-year-old with a ready smile, he reassures the thousands who show up at each of his five weekend services that "God has a great future in store for you." His services are rousing affairs that often include his wife, Victoria, leading prayers and his mother, Dodie, discussing passages from the Bible. [...] Similarly, the so-called mainline Protestants who dominated 20th century America have become the religious equivalent of General Motors Corp. (GM ) The large denominations -- including the United Methodist Church and the Episcopal Church -- have been shrinking for decades and have lost more than 1 million members in the past 10 years alone. Today, mainline Protestants account for just 16% of the U.S. population, says University of Akron political scientist John C. Green. In contrast, evangelicalism's theological flexibility gives it the freedom to adapt to contemporary culture. With no overarching authority like the Vatican, leaders don't need to wrestle with a bureaucratic hierarchy that dictates acceptable behavior. "If you have a vision for ministry, you just do it, which makes it far easier to respond to market demand," says University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill sociology professor Christian Smith. With such low barriers to entry, the number of evangelical megachurches -- defined as those that attract at least 2,000 weekly worshippers -- has shot up to 880 from 50 in 1980, figures John N. Vaughan, founder of research outfit Church Growth Today in Bolivar, Mo. He calculates that a new megachurch emerges in the U.S. an average of every two days. Overall, white evangelicals make up more than a quarter of Americans today, experts estimate. The figures are fuzzy because there's no common definition of evangelical, which typically refers to Christians who believe the Bible is the literal work of God. They may include many Southern Baptists, nondenominational churches, and some Lutherans and Methodists. There are also nearly 25 million black Protestants who consider themselves evangelicals but largely don't share the conservative politics of most white ones. Says pollster George Gallup, who has studied religious trends for decades: "The evangelicals are the most vibrant branch of Christianity." [...] businessweek.com