SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (161509)5/6/2005 8:59:58 AM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 281500
 
"Wouldn't it be more sensible to draw the borders to reflect current reality?"
Certainly. 1967 borders with adjustments to the reality on the ground. My understanding is thats where clinton/barak was going. I expect the ultimate solution will leave all parties somewhat unhappy and thats what makes a peace plan. I think key point is that both nations have contigous lands and that means removal of settlers from behind the fence. For the pals it means giving up right of return other than symbolic, rights to some WB and receipt of other land and payments in exchange. Mike



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (161509)5/6/2005 9:58:04 AM
From: Noel de Leon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"How about the borders where the Israelis already are?"

If what you want to achieve is:
1) Greater support for Hamas and Hizbullah

2) A non-contiguous Palestinian state

3) Continued lack of international support.

4) Ongoing attacks by Palestinians.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News