To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (161514 ) 5/5/2005 10:40:00 PM From: Win Smith Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500 General Taguba issued his report and made it public BEFORE the pictures came out. This must be Nadine history at work, through the looking glass and all that. A couple refs:A month later, General Karpinski was formally admonished and quietly suspended, and a major investigation into the Army’s prison system, authorized by Lieutenant General Ricardo S. Sanchez, the senior commander in Iraq, was under way. A fifty-three-page report, obtained by The New Yorker, written by Major General Antonio M. Taguba and not meant for public release, was completed in late February. Its conclusions about the institutional failures of the Army prison system were devastating. Specifically, Taguba found that between October and December of 2003 there were numerous instances of “sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses” at Abu Ghraib. This systematic and illegal abuse of detainees, Taguba reported, was perpetrated by soldiers of the 372nd Military Police Company, and also by members of the American intelligence community. (The 372nd was attached to the 320th M.P. Battalion, which reported to Karpinski’s brigade headquarters.) Taguba’s report listed some of the wrongdoing: newyorker.com It was leaked, yes, and Seymour Hersch got the usual full measure of respect from W's legions of smear artists for following up on it. Made public? I don't think so, except maybe in the usual "words mean what I say they mean" fashion of the local grand arbiter. The FAS Secrecy Project continued to push for greater openness where disclosure is legitimate. In early May when shocking images of U.S. personnel at Baghdad’s Abu Ghraib prison abusing Iraqi prisoners burst into public view, the Secrecy Project was among those pressing for full disclosure of the internal Army report on the matter. The March 2004 report is known as the “Taguba report” after its author, Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba. The report soon leaked into the public domain (and can also be found on the FAS web site) even though it nominally remains classified. On May 6 the Secrecy Project filed a complaint with the government’s Information Security Oversight Office challenging the classification of the report. fas.org