SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (161514)5/5/2005 10:40:00 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
General Taguba issued his report and made it public BEFORE the pictures came out.

This must be Nadine history at work, through the looking glass and all that. A couple refs:

A month later, General Karpinski was formally admonished and quietly suspended, and a major investigation into the Army’s prison system, authorized by Lieutenant General Ricardo S. Sanchez, the senior commander in Iraq, was under way. A fifty-three-page report, obtained by The New Yorker, written by Major General Antonio M. Taguba and not meant for public release, was completed in late February. Its conclusions about the institutional failures of the Army prison system were devastating. Specifically, Taguba found that between October and December of 2003 there were numerous instances of “sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses” at Abu Ghraib. This systematic and illegal abuse of detainees, Taguba reported, was perpetrated by soldiers of the 372nd Military Police Company, and also by members of the American intelligence community. (The 372nd was attached to the 320th M.P. Battalion, which reported to Karpinski’s brigade headquarters.) Taguba’s report listed some of the wrongdoing: newyorker.com

It was leaked, yes, and Seymour Hersch got the usual full measure of respect from W's legions of smear artists for following up on it. Made public? I don't think so, except maybe in the usual "words mean what I say they mean" fashion of the local grand arbiter.

The FAS Secrecy Project continued to push for greater openness where disclosure is legitimate. In early May when shocking images of U.S. personnel at Baghdad’s Abu Ghraib prison abusing Iraqi prisoners burst into public view, the Secrecy Project was among those pressing for full disclosure of the internal Army report on the matter. The March 2004 report is known as the “Taguba report” after its author, Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba.

The report soon leaked into the public domain (and can also be found on the FAS web site) even though it nominally remains classified. On May 6 the Secrecy Project filed a complaint with the government’s Information Security Oversight Office challenging the classification of the report.
fas.org



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (161514)5/5/2005 10:43:07 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 281500
 
But Nadine, the ARMY had the pictures TOO! Why didn't the ARMY give the pictures to the press with the report? I imagine the press gets 100 reports of investigations the military has conducted every day, in addition to all the other branches of government spewing reports. Not that I have any respect for the press either. Thank Jehovah for Google!

And we've STILL never seen ALL the pictures. The Congress has, but not us citizens. Thanks to Win for the corrections and the timeline.