Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (161527)	5/6/2005 6:10:53 PM
From: Noel de Leon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I was responding to this: "How about the borders where the Israelis already are?" Now if you look at a map of the West Bank you will see that the settlements control about 70% of the West Bank. The wall about 17%. Nadine did not specify which "borders" she was in favor of. So I take "How about the borders where the Israelis already are?" to mean(considering her extreme Zionist approach to the problem) the 70% and not the 17%. Even if she meant the 17% it still is not certain that the Palestinians would accept this without massive compensation since an accept of the wall represents an accept of thievery. I don't believe that the Israelis can offer a complete removal of all settlements outside the wall since this would be political suicide for anyone to do so. Said in another way: some right wing Israeli nut case would shoot who ever proposed that solution. What I would be happy with is not relevant.